Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rcal10

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,981

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rcal10

  1. Rcal10
    WOW. You are spending way too much time arguing with a clueless individual or just someone who wants a reason to howl at the moon. He lost me when he questioned you on his home and road performance as if it couldn’t be verified. To add to your comments, Bregman’s career stats are better on the road. Just in case people want to suggest he took advantage of a short left field in Houston and Boston. I admire your patience. But this guy isn’t going to change.
  2. Rcal10
    So is this a moral or ethical issue with you or do you believe he was only good because he cheated and Shaw can be just as good. Because, I have to tell you if your issue is with Bregman morally, and that is what you are basing wanted Shaw over Bregman, I couldn’t disagree more. I don’t understand how you can suggest Bregman is this bad guy because he cheated, and then not comment on Shaw’s views. I think Shaw’s beliefs are way more offensive than Bregman cheating. And, if you think Shaw is better than Bregman, your wrong there too. We can only hope turns into what Bregman is. And if he does he will be an awesome second baseman on the ‘27 team. He will also be someone I will never like as a human.
  3. Rcal10
    Which, IMO, is why I don’t think they were interested in Tucker. Not a bad guy, but not a leader and a bit of a loner.
  4. Rcal10
    Yep. I don’t see a need unless they want someone other than Alcantara, assuming he does have one more option year left. Or maybe they add Goldy? Let Austin go. 🤷 I think the comment that the Cubs don’t have an issue going over is so that the Hoerner trade talk would die down. I don’t take it to mean they will add someone else. However, they could trade Taillon for a minor leaguer and sign Gallen. That would put them over. And I can see something like that. It helps the ‘27 team too. One less FA to have to replace in ‘27.
  5. Rcal10
    I thought I read Alcantara was out of options. If he has one then adding someone like Tauchman wouldn’t be a bad idea. Let Kevin get AB in Iowa.
  6. Rcal10
    What does this mean? Alcantara doesn’t have options left. So if they get someone to take his spot he can’t be se t down. Mo should be fine as a DH. Who do you think they will get and who will he replace. I think the comment of them going over this year is just to reassure the fan base that Nico doesn’t have to be traded. I guess they could bring in a bat to replace Austin, but I don’t think they will. And that doesn’t solve the Suzuki, Mo, Alcantara merry go round. As I said, I don’t even know what that means.
  7. Rcal10
    I may be in the minority in this, but I don’t think the Cubs would have given Tucker the contract they gave Bregman. I think they like Bregman better, period. Regardless of the years or money. I also think the original plan with Tucker was bring him over, have him love the city and try signing him to a large contract. I think the Cubs decided he wasn’t t the type of player they want. I don’t agree with the Cubs on this one. I think Tucker is the better player. But, IMO, there was something the Cubs FO didn’t like about him.
  8. Rcal10
    To me, all it does is push Shaw to utility for a year. But if they do trade him it better be for someone with close to the same amount of control left and similar upside. Preferably a pitcher. Personally, I wouldn’t trade him. He would be my second baseman in ‘27. But there is a world where the Cubs can resign Hoerner and the pitcher they get for Shaw could be in the rotation next year. One example would be Shaw to the Angels for Soriano. That might not work. And I am not suggesting that exact move. It is just an example. A young bat for a young pitcher. But then they need to keep Hoerner beyond this season. And I am fine with that.
  9. Rcal10
    They didn’t get rid of Shaw. He is still on the team and will probably get 300-400 AB next year. They just added an all star third baseman. I expect Shaw will be the 2nd baseman in ‘27. As far as your ridiculous rant on cheating goes, I don’t care. If I only wanted players who qualify for your moral high ground you are taking, I probably would field a team. All players do whatever they think will give them an advantage. I am sure there are players cheating right now. I can dislike a person as a human being but cheer for him as a ballplayer. I do find it interesting that your distain for Bregman yet say nothing about Shaw and his white supremist beliefs. Guess you are ok with that. Given the choice of the two I would take Bregman over Shaw all day long on the moral high ground debate. I have given up on worrying about players beliefs,, views or morals when evaluating them as players. I put them all in the same bucket with the belief none of them are people who should be role models. They just play baseball and if they are in my team I will cheer for them. One caveat to this view is criminal behavior such as domestic violence, etc….
  10. Rcal10
    I agree. We should all be happy the Cubs finally targeted a guy and got him. For once, let other fan bases suggest how dumb the Cubs were and praise their FO for not signing such a crazy contract. Many of us have done that for years. I think this is a great move as far as Bregman, the ballplayer. But even better sign that the Cubs can actually swim in the deep waters of free agency.
  11. Rcal10
    I don’t think they do that now. He is 1 or 5 rotation pieces. And they don’t need that much money for the deadline. But Rea makes sense. He is a spot starter/multi inning guy. Assad can take that role. They already have Webb, Harvey, Maton, Palencia, Milner, Theilbar and then guys like Assad, Brown, Wicks, Little, Hodge and probably a few I am forgetting. They can spare Rea.
  12. Rcal10
    I think the only one who might not be here in April is Alcantara, assuming no trades. No chance Shaw isn’t here and I really think Ballesteros is the DH. Maybe they add a lefty outfielder, (Tauchman) but I doubt it.
  13. Rcal10
    This is a bit of an overreaction. They would save $6M to be able to spend at the TDL if they traded their swing starter/multi inning relief pitcher. Basically JAG. I agree they don’t need to do this. But insane if they did? Nope.
  14. Rcal10
    In his last 4 seasons where he accumulated over 2500 PA his WAR is 17. How is that not very good? All those years are post “cheat” years.
  15. Rcal10
    Why do we get trolls every time the Cubs do something significant? We end up with new posters who are just here to howl at the moon. This is another example.
  16. Rcal10
    Does he have to win ROY, or is it if he comes in the top 3 and qualifies from a top prospect standpoint?
  17. Rcal10
    If Mo makes the OD roster and stats the entire season he also has a shot at ROY. Don’t the Cubs get a pick if that happens as well? What is that rule?
  18. Rcal10
    Seems like he did take the Cubs help. He definitely altered his stance and swing during the year. I doubt they trade Shaw.
  19. Rcal10
    I could see a Rea trade as well. But if they are just under I can also see Assad traded instead of Rea. It isn’t a big salary relief, but it is something. Maybe they sit $3M under. They would be able to add something at the TDL, if they had to do something. Plus, if all pitchers are healthy, they would have 6 pitchers. Maybe they move Tailon then.
  20. Rcal10
    Wins the internet.
  21. Rcal10
    When did Shaw become my boy. What is wrong with you? I love the move for Bregman. I actually agreed with you that though we loved it we both doubted it would happen. Cubs signing him doesn’t lessen any belief in Shaw. Doesn’t mean he is, at best, a back up infielder. Maybe for ‘26 he is. But he will most likely be the starting second baseman next year. I don’t like Shaw, the man. But he is a good ballplayer and this move strengthens the bench with him on it. Dude, lighten up.
  22. Rcal10
    Cool. It is the few million that matter, if you believe they want to stay under. I honestly am not sure they care. Also, Bregman didn’t have a QO attached, right? Another small win.
  23. Rcal10
    It is great news. Wonder if the deferrals will make enough difference to actually keep the Cubs under the LT. Honestly, I don’t care either way. But maybe they do?🤷
  24. Rcal10
    Wow. First the Cubs act like a major market by targeting a guy and getting him. And now we learn they also did it using deferred money. What a great turn of events. Not sure what was more unexpected. This deal or the Bears comeback.
  25. Rcal10
    I wouldn’t have a problem with this bench either. Just asking because I have see. Others expecting to add or change something. I think the team is set. And a very good team all around.
×
×
  • Create New...