i just wanted to quote this and say it was really good and that i read it, since it looks like no one else did. um, ok. i guess you should read my posts, b/c it looks like you didn't. i did say that injuries could have caused the regression. we don't really know as Kearns hasn't been 100% or has been platooning. too few data points means you can make any argument you want about Kearn's BABIP. unless the injury kearns sustained was blindness in one eye, and we have reason to believe his vesion is about to come back, i dont see how one could argue that it's reasonable that he's going to get that line drive percentage up to where a .370 babip is a good bet