That's how I understand it, but honestly, my grasp of baseball contract structure is not too hot. if this is the contract, i don't know why we're posting happy gifs. the absolute best case scenario is that we pay 28 million dollars for two full seasons in the major leagues to a guy who is 21 and 22 in those seasons. and that the contract is completely frontloaded so we can pay him like 2M for his 23 and quickly escalating from there. that'd get us two or three seasons of good value (assuming he is good, of course). if the contract is backloaded, we're looking at basically no seasons of really good value unless he's a hall of famer and starts dropping 5+ war a year at age 23 (or sooner, i guess). i'm certainly willing to change my mind on this, though. someone smart convince me. EDIT in my original thing, i pushed his mlb debut in 14 back so i could give us another year of control, then i forgot to include it (which ssr caught on the last page). that obviously makes things moderately better, but not enormously so. it really, really is all about how the money is spread out.