IN DAYTONA: VEAL: 69 IP, 36 BB GALL: 78 IP, 21 BB At an equal level this year, Gallagher had better control. Veal's walks could spike at West Tenn too...we just don't know. (BTW, their Peoria walk totals: VEAL: 73 IP, 40 BB; GALL: 146 IP, 55 BB) Yes, I know this, and it wasn't the point. Any way you slice it, a WHIP approaching 1.5 is not good. That's what Gallagher's doing in WT. He's got dominant overall numbers, but he's mostly doing passably at AA (which is no small feat, don't get me wrong) after dominating at high A. Veal has been dominating consistently all season long. Opponents hit .180 against Veal; they hit .248 againt Gallagher. With the walk rates being near identical, I'll take the guy who gets more people out, especially when the other guy is going the wrong way on walk rate. Yes, Veal's walks could spike at WT. There is a concern for that. What does that have to do with who wins the 2006 minor league player of the year award?