Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. That's awesome. Give him 2-3 months to try and make it work in one of the best pitching dev ecosystems in the sport, and if it doesn't you've got a dynamic reliever and Cobb/Ray coming back from rehab. While scouring for Imanaga news I ventured into Giants Twitter and they all hate Farhan for most of the same reasons Cubs fans hate Jed.
  2. Not a ton of surprises, but a few things that stood out for me personally: - ZiPS sees the Cubs as presently constructed finishing in the mid 80's for wins - Justin Steele are a formidable 1-2, but ZiPS does not like Taillon or Hendricks. Hendricks surprises me a bit because ZiPS usually picks up on FIP-beating prowess - Alzolay has a pretty disappointing projection, but that's because the computer has him starting some games. He gets a 3.00 ERA projection as a pure reliever. Ben Brown gets a 3.20 as a pure reliever - Nick Madrigal projects to 1.8 WAR in only 350 PAs. That's a 3 win pace. It loooooves his defense - ZiPS is as skeptical as many about Cody Bellinger, projecting just 2.7 WAR and a 108 OPS+ - ZiPS doesn't love any of the offensive prospects to make much impact beyond PCA. However this stuck out
  3. The beauty of being 5'10" instead of 6'4"
  4. I would guess if it's not a trade or the weather it's a personal/family type matter
  5. That is a really nifty deal for the Yankeees to get Stroman. I wonder if he left money on the table to go to NYC instead of like Kansas City or Pittsburgh? I'd put it with Imanaga and Lugo for deals the rest of the league is most likely to look at in like June and say "How the hell did we let that go by?"
  6. I like him a lot. He had some high profile blowup but he basically had to remake himself on the fly. If he'd gotten 4-6 weeks at Iowa people wouldn't have such a sour taste in their mouth about him.
  7. Just thinking about this a bit more. I don't expect Jed to push his chips in this aggressively, but this fits what we think payroll will be and is probably one of the five best position player groups in baseball, no? Pretty clear #1 defense and top 10 offense? LF - Happ DH - Morel RF - Suzuki CF - Bellinger 3B - Chapman SS - Swanson 1B - Busch C - Gomes 2B - Hoerner With a top 3 farm system ready to back it up. The pitching staff is probably two guys light, but then again the farm will help there too plus the defense will make the whole thing play up.
  8. As a lefty who can handle the ball up Busch is a good offensive complement to Matt Chapman...
  9. Here's the thing. The Cubs now have two good defensive 3B whose bats we don't totally trust (Madrigal, Mastro), and three good offensive 3B whose gloves we don't totally trust (Wisdom, Morel, Busch) Either Matt Chapman is a lot more likely than we're collectively expecting, or the team feels at least one of those latter 3B options is actually adequate defensively.
  10. FWIW - All of these are right in line with the MLBTR estimates though so nothing really changes
  11. A few stray thoughts, some of these have been touched on I think. - Odds PCA opens the year in MLB are basically nil now. No way two opening day spots are manned by rookies with 100 MLB plate appearances between them - That in turn makes me even more sure Bellinger is coming back (I was like 85% sure this morning, I'm 90-something now) - I don't think staying under the LT is the plan, but it's certainly more feasible than it was a few hours ago - Adding a second substantial SP feels much more likely now than it did prior. Conversely adding a second FA bat isn't as much of a certainty anymore (though I'd guess it's still more likely than not) - Feels pretty likely that one of Morel/Busch is the everyday 3B, or Morel's about to be traded. It doesn’t HAVE to be either/or, but it feels pretty either/or - Another trade is probably not far behind this. Even if it's just a minor cleaning up the 40 man sort of deal - Between this and the low AAV on Imanaga, I think it's very likely that Jed pays market price on a FA reliever like Hicks or Stephenson
  12. Among 410 pitchers with 40+ IP last year, he was 55th in Stuff+ per Fangraphs. Command is pretty iffy but he's a guy, and that's before any pitch lab tweaks the team might have cooked up. If he's clearly the lesser of two RPs we acquire I feel pretty good about him.
  13. Really good call from Brett here. The Cubs actually know Busch as well as anyone because of Kelly.
  14. Let's assume the plan is still Bellinger and Hoskins. You'd have a lineup of something like Happ (LF) Hoskins (1B) Seiya (RF) Bellinger (CF) Swanson (SS) Hoerner (2B) Morel (DH) Busch (3B) Gomes (C) No superstar bat, but every spot in that lineup projects north of league average except catcher, and Gomes/Amaya are likely above average offensively by catcher standards.
  15. ZiPS projects Busch to a 109 OPS+, -2 runs on defense, and 2.5 WAR. There's not a ton left in the tank IMO but you absolutely trade any teenage arm in A ball for that. 100 times out of 100. Great trade from Jed, even though I like Ferris more as a prospect.
  16. WOW! There's a LHH power hitter and a 3B all in one go. I did not expect an option like this to be on the market, very very cool. I do think Busch is overrated but he absolutely fills a need here.
  17. Sinker/slider guy with good extension, Tommy will love him
  18. I think the expectation is two bats and two relievers. With the smoke around Bellinger and Hoskins, combined with the fact that it's pretty tough to see a lot of alternatives for either of them them (Giants for Hoskins...and who the heck knows for Bellinger), I'm starting to chalk them up as more or less inevitable. The relievers it would be foolhardy to anchor onto one or two. Robert Stephenson and Matt Moore have each gotten mentions, and they're the approximate level of cost and impact I expect so they're the placeholders in my head right now. Chris Morel and the trade market are where I think there's some opportunity for wiggle room. My expectation at this point is they're just going to try and make Morel at 3B work. If it doesn't, Madrigal can step in and be adequate until one of the youths or the trade deadline can address the position more satisfactorily. If he doesn't get run at 3B, he would seem to be a trade chip. We know from all the local writers Jed's been working the phones with other teams pretty hard. I expect a couple of trades, even if they're minor ones around the bullpen or bench.
  19. Why would they decline the option if he's good? We live in a world where Sean Manaea got 2/26 after showing a new pitch and some brief strong performance. If Shota's putting up 3 WAR seasons no one's going to flinch about holding onto him at 3/50. He'll be 32 not 42.
  20. This is a pretty good deal for both sides and I wonder if we see this sort of thing more often for high variance guys. If I read this right, then basically: - If Shota's good or great it's 5/80 - If Shota's average-ish it's 2/30 - If Shota's bad/hurt it's 4/53
  21. Again keep in mind that Heyman is usually quite plugged in with Boras
  22. Yeah based on when I looked at future payroll, I expect that over the next three offseasons Jed is only going to make 2-3 more long term contracts of substance. He is absolutely not going to use two of those limited bullets right away this offseason. Smart money for the rest of this winter is one of Bellinger/Chapman, a 1B/DH of the opposite handedness (lets say Hoskins and Belt respectively), and two setup caliber relievers. Maybe another pre-FA SP like is being discussed in the other thread or some fiddling with the bench.
×
×
  • Create New...