Bertz
-
Posts
12,353 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Bertz
-
Makes sense. I think Mo was the natural assumption for giving short term 1B coverage but Amaya's also a guy we'd love to get in the lineup more. And unlike Mo you're not going to be as wistful about taking some of his defensive focus away from behind the plate. Barring a Busch injury you're probably talking about 2-3 games a month that need to be covered, we don't need to let perfect be the enemy of good enough.
-
I think ultimately he's going to get something like the Turner role from last year. That said he doesn't have huge splits, in fact to this point he's got modest reverse splits, so it's not crazy to hope for an everyday player. I suspect despite being the most obvious 1 for 1 replacement he's not going to fill in for Austin coming out of camp though. It seems pretty clear the team is nervous about outfield depth, so I think they're going to take the opportunity to be able to hold onto both of Conforto/Carlson. And not really tied to Austin but on a similar note I'd be pretty shocked if they don't add McCormick to the 40 man roster and stash him at Iowa.
-
I mean small sample he has a career ERA under 3, and while that's obviously got some good fortune behind it he's clearly doing some things right from a process standpoint since every projection system on Fangraphs expects him to have an ERA under 4.
-
Taillon pitched poorly but his velo was back to normal, which I'll absolutely take over the vice-versa.
-
Busch is being given the opportunity to play against LHP. So at least initially Austin was presumably going to mostly pair with Mo at DH.
-
I suspect it's a simple matter of turning Conforto/Carlson into an "and" instead of an "or". Given the timing Conforto probably got signed when the team found out about this.
-
Basically there are two area where there are a disproportionate number of should-be strikes called balls. The low outside corner is number 1, and then the entire top of the zone is number 2. Eno glazed over the low outside corner because everyone's always trying to hit that target, whereas top of the zone is a place where only some guys try to live.
-
Interesting. Curious to see what they've got lined up for him besides the obvious focus on velo.
-
Looks like he was 93.5 in the first inning and 92.2 in the second. That first inning is about as hard as we've ever seen him throw, the second was way better than his 2025 but right in line with his 2024 averages (maybe a smidge on the higher side). So good news overall, it's more of just a question of how good.
-
👀 Shota's fastball was 93.5 during the first inning today. He threw four fastballs harder than any fastball he threw last year
-
Holy hell this is the 3rd Braves pitcher to have their arm explode this spring and it's not even March
-
Yeah I'd say so. I can't quite get to Eno's numbers but the Statcast searching I am doing says Steele's in between the two, and closer to Shota than Boyd. Steele throws fewer of his fastballs up than either guy, but it's balanced out by throwing more fastballs.
-
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7064417/2026/02/24/mlb-abs-system-challenges-pitcher-benefits/ Eno Sarris theorizes that pitchers who live on the top of the zone will get the most love from ABS. Cubs have two of the top guys in Shota and Boyd.
-
Plopping this here since there was some discourse about it over the offseason. tl;dr is teams are paying about $10.5M per win, but there's a big split between role players ($6-7M) and good players ($12+)
-
Helloooo, Ben Brown Sinker
Bertz replied to Matthew Trueblood's topic in North Side Baseball Front Page News
Sahadev Sharma let the cat out of the bag with this sinker a few days ago: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7053313/2026/02/18/a-look-at-what-three-pitchers-are-working-on-as-the-cubs-build-rotation-depth/ One of the things that stuck out to me from that was this It's interesting to come back to this after seeing the details you pulled on the pitch. This is not what I was thinking when I initially read "sinker," but if the goal is to make life miserable against righties you see why this is what they settled on. Like you said it seems like it will make a damn good lane changer. I'll be curious to see what Brown does against a more balanced lineup. Does the sinker get play against lefties? Does the changeup usage get much higher than last year? The quote above makes it sound like the changes might be more incremental vs the other side of the plate. -
Fangraphs in their Top 100 prospects list writeup a few weeks ago noted that Rojas hadnt performed well against velocity. So I'm maybe more impressed that it came off a 96 MPH fastball than I am that he hit it 413 feet.
-
🚨 Ty Southisene hit a ball 106 Not especially impressive broadly but for a guy who showed deadball era type power last year that catches my eye.
-
I wonder if he was more amped to throw them so they had more juice? Also worth noting it doesn't have a ton of sink. More of a running fastball than a sinker.
-
Threw the data in excel and yeah looks like it's two distinct pitches. 2 Seamer?: 10 pitches, 97.4 MPH, 11.8 inch vert, 14.7 inch horizontal 4 seamer: 8 pitches, 96.6 MPH, 15 inch vert, 7.0 inch horizontal The 4 is pretty close to what he threw last year
-
If you look though there's two bands of movement. Vertical's a little all over the place but horizontal there's a bunch of stuff at 6-8 and a bunch at 13+ and little in between.
-
Brown threw 0 changeups that outing, but it looks like he might have been mixing in the sinker.
-
Seiya's playing a good bit if CF this spring and in the WBC, I'd guess we see Shaw out there too. My understanding is CF is the easiest spot on the diamon if you have the requisite athleticism. That last bench spot goes to Carlson or Conforto IMO. How each guy looks this spring obviously plays into it but to your point I'd guess Carlson likely gets an added boost to his chances if neither of Seiya/Shaw look decent out there.
-
They have Shelby Miller's spot to play with. Plus Dean's spot on the 40 man should be pretty tenuous.
-
The team doesn't really need another LHH bat if everyone is healthy. I suspect in the name of depth Conforto an Carlson are competing to be stashed on that last bench spot while Alcantara and McCormick head to Iowa. It would be ideal for Carlson or Conforto to be on a minors deal that doesn't have an end of spring training opt out, but I'm guessing against things working out that neatly.
-
I'm hoping this wnds up being a minor league deal or a split contract or something of the sort, but I suspect it won't be. After dealing Caissie the roster was in a weird spot where it didn't need another LHH bat by default, but if god forbid something happened to Happ or Suzuki (or to a lesser extent Mo) you'd really feel Owen's absence. My guess is in the name of hording depth one of Conforto/Carlson gets the last spot on the big league bench, McCormick gets added to the 40 man so he can be optioned to Iowa. and Alcantara's 100% opening the year at Iowa. The big question on the latter is how much of all these OF machinations are a lack of faith in him versus other rationales.
