Jump to content
North Side Baseball

squally1313

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by squally1313

  1. Manning and Rodgers didn't win anything, but the Steelers, who haven't won a playoff game since 2016 (right around the ultimate decline of a, at least borderline, HOF QB, are 'winning without them'.
  2. It's the incremental piece. $3-$4.5m.
  3. Would you consider a team similar to the one on the field in the second half of last year? Because that team played at a 91 win pace. I don't like reducing sample sizes more than necessary, but this team with Productive PCA and Paredes instead of Morel (or really just...not having Morel), was a little different than opening day. And yes, please, go get a starter to challenge Shota and Steele, or go make a trade for a 140 wRC bat. Or do both. With Bellinger opting in, it gets a lot harder to see the options for drastic change. I just think the baseline is a little higher than others do.
  4. Wacha to the Royals, 3/51 with a team option for a fourth year at $21m.
  5. You have 6 guys (Happ, PCA, Suzuki, Bellinger, Busch, Rooker) for 5 spots (LF/CF/RF/DH/1B), and that's before doing potentially dumb/creative things like giving Busch a second baseman's glove. Everybody gets a day off once a week and you always have an above league average hitter on your bench. Seems plenty workable to me.
  6. Yeah I've yet to see a compelling argument for taking pieces of that group (Happ, Seiya, Hoerner, Taillon) and moving them off the roster in a way that improves the 2025 team. They all performed, we have plenty of money, and there's no sure thing in Iowa forcing them out. But I think if things go south in 2025 or kinda regardless next offseason, you have to start thinking about breaking that group up into smaller chunks one way or another. Hopefully that's forced by us bringing in a couple big name guys this offseason. But it's too much turnover at once and it comes about a year (maybe a year and a half) too late to align with the internal replacements.
  7. I think I agree conceptually that the main problem is the lack of cheap production, but I don't know how that problem is solved by signing two free agent pitchers instead of one free agent hitter. Yeah most of our prospects are on the offensive side of the spectrum, but our starting spots are 9/9 filled as we speak, and Soto is the only elite option out there, so go get him, make the bench a strength, and then turn the cheap prospect offense into cheap pitching.
  8. I won't pretend like it's the most efficient use of resources, but in terms of LT concern for 2026 and (less so) going forward, I could us being in a position similar to where the Astros find themselves with Tucker or Jays find themselves with Vlad. Guys like Happ, Suzuki, Hoerner aren't at that caliber, but I think would still be moderately attractive as trade targets on a one year deal and we would be in a spot where we'd have ready to go replacements in AAA for league minimum. I'm not really advocating for that kind of move before next offseason, but if we make some big splashes this year it's a path to explore.
  9. Soto's last at bat as a Yankee ends in a ground ball to first. Hopefully the whole fan base blames him for not coming through in the clutch.
  10. What kind of lead do you have to have to consider pulling Cole in the hopes he can give you something in game 7
  11. It does not, purely an offensive statistic.
  12. In the Soto scenario why are we guaranteed to get Hendricks level production out of his spot in the rotation?
  13. Trying to avoid circular logic here, but, while Wisdom got a disproportionate amount of PAs against LHPs, the theory is that he got his starts/pinch hit opportunities against the high quality lefties (ie, the ones Counsell didn't think Busch could handle). It didn't work on the whole in 2024 (though people above have shown it worked for most of the year), but all in all a 112 wRC against LHP is fine for a bench bat that can be leveraged into those spots.
  14. Why can't Jed be proactive and remove players from the roster before they have an extended cold streak??? Another failure in the front office, along with signing 2025-2026 Anthony Rizzo for $26m. This guy stinks!
  15. It's not that much cheaper. these days. I'm probably moving the goalposts a little bit here, but the worst seat at the United Center (for a Hawks game) is a lot better than the worst seat at Wrigley. I'm pretty comfortable going on TM/Stubhub and picking the cheapest seat available for the Hawks, whereas for the Cubs it'd have to be a pretty elite game to be down the lines or super far under the overhang, so I'm usually paying more than it would technically take just to get in the door. Bottom line, none of those three teams have shown anything close to deserving that kind of financial commitment at this point. You'd think they would realize that and get people on a cheaper, auto-renewing payment plan and then justify a price increase based on improved performance (even if just regression to the mean).
  16. It's an insane proposition. I hate paying the $20/month for Marquee, but at least in that scenario I'm getting 25 games a month out of it. The Hawks play 12 games in November.
  17. There's a non-zero chance tonight might be Rizzo's last professional baseball game.
  18. You really think so negatively of Jed Hoyer, who in his first major moves as GM sold off basically whatever was left of the 2016 team (correctly), that you think the Yankees would decline what is essentially an $11m option (either paying him $17m or buying him out for $6m), and then we would come in and sign him for more money, and a whole additional year, and then would point to him as our power bat (2024 slugging: .335, below average hitter the last two years), so that he could make Michael Busch, who played all of 18 innings anywhere besides first base last year, our 'Ben Zobrist of 2025'? You really think that's his plan?
  19. Eh. They won the covid title and were the team that last knocked us out of an actual playoff spot, a year after we beat them in a series with at least a couple hate-able moments (Adrian Gonzalez and the review at the plate specifically). They've been the main boss to get out of the NL for like 8 years now. More than enough for a lot of people.
  20. Are we really asking why people dislike the most successful baseball team of the last decade? I get wanting to emulate their front office philosophy but fans of other teams hating the good teams in anything is historically like the most basic and universally accepted concept to grasp.
  21. is that your actual guess
  22. ...oh great, ANOTHER elite young hitter that jed probably won't pay for
  23. Yeah fine, I was using the above numbers for Eovaldi and Joc (so 34 instead of 40), and didn't really anticipate another 12 in total for the bottom two spots. Think if you can get a Cease (arb estimate: 13.7) or King (7.8), you live with Ben Brown instead of a 6 reliever and/or just ride with a Tauchman/Amaya/MIF/Canario for a little while
  24. Probably leaves room for the Cease/King trade idea being bounced around elsewhere too. I can't see the names TT mentioned getting all that close to $80m (in a Bellinger opt out world), King or Cease at $15m or so in their last year of arbitration should still fit. Still no long term contracts on the books, or an elite bat in the lineup, but Taillon as your fifth pitcher is real appetizing.
×
×
  • Create New...