WrigleyField 22
-
Posts
19,067 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by WrigleyField 22
-
Ohtani to Dodgers for an ungodly amount of money
WrigleyField 22 replied to JD94's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Okay but the Boob one is legit. If he told me Ohtani to Cubs was done I'd have major fatalism right now. -
Ohtani to Dodgers for an ungodly amount of money
WrigleyField 22 replied to JD94's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Stop sandbagging and enjoy hot stove season in all it's glory. With the way MLB has gone this could be one of the few good ones left. -
Ohtani to Dodgers for an ungodly amount of money
WrigleyField 22 replied to JD94's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Gonna cling to the Boob effect until the very end /don't care -
Ohtani to Dodgers for an ungodly amount of money
WrigleyField 22 replied to JD94's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Just here to pile on with the Nightingale jokes -
I realize they were metaphorical, but I think a 2nd best ACC team is gonna struggle to ever make it, even if they win it. We'll see how BigTen plays out. I guess they're doing away with divisions so it may help, but I could see a team playing it's way out of a CFP appearance with a bad CC appearance (or I guess an injury to their QB apparently)
-
Louisville won't because they're in wrong conference. Iowa probably won't either but the BigTen team who doesn't have to put a new L on their resume probably will.
-
Seems pretty clear the edge is gonna get set around BigTen and SEC 4/5 and most of the rest of the other conference options.
-
Are we ready to skip past the middle step of the mega conference duopoly and go right to the relegation model that obviously makes ncaaf most fun?
-
The 4 best argument thimg is of course subjective BS because OSU got zero play on that and most anyone would put them in that subjective conversation. It's just random timing and conference alignment that leaves them out of the same convo that people were also putting Georgia in.
-
Thats the absolute dumbest rationale possible. It's the 2023 season, not the 10 year running championship. This is exactly the complex I'm talking about lol. SEC has apparently reached participation trophy level status. Absurd.
-
So apparently the committee process is to first create groups of three and only use the h2h or other criteria among comparable teams? So for example Texas' h2h over Bama doesn't count if they aren't in the same group of 3. So basically there's a hugely consequential decision creating two groups of 3 among the top 7 and one schools accomplishments are basically unimportant. I guess that school is either OSU (for not playing) or Texas (for not winning against a good enough opponent). That call between OSU and Texas basically determines everything then, unless GA loss is deemed bad enough to drop them 6 spots.
-
I'm an absolutely ncaa football casual, but have been mixing it up in the comments section of nccaf Twitter. SEC fans and their sense of superiority is insane. Arguments created out of cloth with no regard to CFP actual criteria. Appeals to results from 2021+2022.
-
We'd get some seeding complaints at the very least. 😊
-
There was some smoke about Cleveland trading up to 2. And Josh Lucas in one of his interviews alluded to that belief as well. Not sure anyone from SF ever has or will confirm if any real offer was on the table though. In any case there has been reporting that Mahomes and Trubisky were neck and neck in Bears org, so paying an insurance policy when that's your own internal evaluation and consensus boards were all split across 3 guys is obviously moronic.
-
And if they don't take a QB top 2 in this draft they most likely would need to in order to get a similar caliber QB prospect again. QB is undoubtedly the one position you're allowed to trade up for.
-
Yes, I'm under no illusion they will do a shotgun approach. But I think in the "Justin balls out" hypothetical it's a valid idea. But NFL FOs are just too conservative and only willing to try things that might fail in a specific way (usually passive failure). Doing something proactive and failing is not allowed though. Probably more plausible is just that Justin does well enough that the return on his trade is kind of decent. If they are for some reason they aren't gonna trade him I think they need to trade down from one of those two picks and make sure to pick up extra 2025 and 2026 capital. Even if that means it's the top pick and losing out on MHJ. At some point they'll likely need to be ready to have horsepower to trade back up for a QB. The shotgun approach on a tier 2 QB (Daniels, Penix, McCarthy) is of course a possibility too, but if you've convinced yourself you can bridge Fields and develop a QB, I'd still say just go big on Caleb. But full disclosure, the absolute best thing about the shotgun approach would be the absolute Twitter mayhem on draft night. 80% of the fan base being ecstatic that Poles is all in on Fields and 20% being bummed he's out on QB, and then have tables flipped woipd be amazing for the TL. 🍿
-
So apparently the popular talking point from many fans and even some media analysts is basically 1. Justin Fields is a top 22 QB 2. QBs at the top of the draft are a crapshoot 3. You can find a QB later if Justin doesn't work out. Do these idiots with their crapshoot odds realize it's still like 4x as likely to find a good QB in the top 5 than the other 250+ draft slots you might draft a QB.
-
I know it's not a popular opinion, but even if Fields has that finish, I'm just taking a shotgun approach if I have pick #1 (and prob #2). Throw on that 5th year option and start Fields for a least a year and slow develop Caleb as backup. In 2025, reevaluate again.
-
Harbaugh is kooky, not dumb.
-
There is of course no rush to make any final decision on Justin. You don't have to be in or out or in the middle because none of those should impact how they approach the next 6 weeks. That out of the way, 5 games can only do so much against the rest of the book of work. It'd be foolish to let a barn burner run sway your opinion too wildly. What happens with the Car pick is going to influence their decision 10x more than what Fields does. That's just the plain reality of it all, imo.
-
I don't have much to say except bump. Why are we still chatting in the Vikings thread lol
-
I want to make clear that there aren't really any factual statements you can make where the owner is worth worrying over to me. They're either bad enough I ignore the team or their mid enough I ignore the owner and focus my worries on the employees who actually have a chance of being replaced.
-
Excuse for what? They are like every owner. Not worth getting worked up about because they can't get fired. The choice is stop following the team or shrug your shoulders and try and forget they exist.
-
No, THAT would look like Dan Snyder or Marc Davis. McCaskeys are just.... I don't know, third generation heirs really just sums it up.
-
Probably most?
