Well we don't have much history to go on. Teams used to be pretty liberal with it cuz it was only injury guaranteed and you only lost out on CFA status if you cut a guy later (assuming health). We're a few years in on the fully guaranteed version and teams probably overcorrected on it imo. There's plenty of good data showing how movable QBs are and how expensive even small extensions are. Granted, GMs are known to be unnecessarily conservative. So they probably won't change their thinking, but they should. I'd probably say eff it but it's be a 51/49 call and it's have to be informed decision based on real trade talks. Ideally their hand isn't forced and he's traded early - well before the deadline. But even for like a 3rd rounder, it'd be silly for trading team to not take that 23M option at that cost imo (unless they could get him on a Love-like extension, which, maybe they could). There shouldn't be a big cross section of willing to trade decent capital but unwilling to make a 23M option on him.