Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. Must mean completion.
  2. Media mouthpieces. I choose to believe it still. If it wasn't his mom, must have been gram gram or someone.
  3. I don't think you're an apologist. Terrible game plan that makes a fair evaluation of Fields passing game pretty tough tonight. That said the realist in me was already pretty far past the point of salvaging Fields in Chicago. If he's anything other than a Big B Bust it's because 80% of his development restarts. It's not all his fault, but it's the reality. And Chicago with a likely top 2 pick is incentivized to put that development effort there with a consensus strong set of prospects to choose from. Hope Fields comes back refocused off bye, maybe with a new OC, and raises that trade value as high as he can.
  4. Don't know if I care enough to talk anyone in or out of Harbaugh, but I do think he's a guy you bring in to be de facto GM. Whether that's firing or demoting Poles, I don't think his likely shelf life is worth the upside if you want a GM at top. Rather just swing for fence on young up and coming OC. But if you want more a Reid/Shannahan working to HC/GM, go for it.
  5. Could franchise tag and trade.
  6. 20 whatever screens they called is coaching scared. I don't care if Fields would miss half the reads on slants or whatever, you can't try and beat a team one way only. What an ugly game. Want Warren to have the balls to make changes now, weak ass win notwithstanding.
  7. It's the Bears...
  8. They're adot is like negative 0.5, I don't know if clock is on their side.
  9. Requirement of competence.
  10. Bears are totally blowing this one.
  11. It's been awhile, but the 2018 D had something like 19 picks so probably then.
  12. Have you seen this Bears D? Give a team 45 seconds and the go ahead drive lol
  13. Is it a Thursday? I'm all thrown off. Ugly ass football
  14. No, 20 screens was the only possibly game plan against this D I heard.
  15. Bad pick, but oh well Offense, show up please. Gonna dominate TO battle and lose again aren't they?
  16. We show up too well.
  17. Defining Eberflus game. Can it get him fired?
  18. Evergreen
  19. Would be hilarious if Hawks won lotto again and we could do the probability discussion again lol
  20. Are you confusing Polian with Irsay?
  21. Slashes not acceptable. Man up and put the full ranking
  22. Anyways, I created a Twitter poll and Trestman is up early 74-26 lol. Bland take it is!
  23. The big thing with Trestman and I'm not sure if it was his, Emerys, McCaskeys, or a collective idea, was just trying to squeeze every ounce out of that D (with a coach who never ran the system) rather than a clean break. Clean break that D and bring in young players buying into a fresh system with a DC who actually knew it and maybe that side of the ball isn't as bad. Trestman weirdness still has a shelf life, but I also recall a bunch of things fans/media freaked out about at the time that actually have been somewhat commonplace by other coaches since then (I.e. Rotating captains). At least some of his weirdness was different, but ultimately fine.
×
×
  • Create New...