I don't know if it was *horrendous* 3 for 2 or 2 for 1 swaps in the mid rounds are probably bad value propositions in the mid rounds on a macro level. It's not great process driven drafting... Probably. At the end of the day you are trading for a player though, not a draft slot. Even if all you get from Montgomery is 4 years of good RB play on rookie value contract it's probably a good deal. We don't know how he was valued by the Bears. If he had a mid 2nd grade on him you can kind of work yourself into logic that it's slightly better value that it looks like on paper. FYI the traditional trade value chart seems to line up, so it seem relatively market value, though I tend to think that chart generally speaking values those mid round picks too far apart.