WrigleyField 22
-
Posts
19,067 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by WrigleyField 22
-
Could create lots of opportunity, which Pax will probably use to flip 7 for Ball or something dumb.
-
You're an odd duck.
-
No that's the assistant to the GM.
-
Asst GM is just a weird title in football in general. Most teams seem to have just embraced the "Director" titles. What does he actually do?
-
Eh, it's not bad for the opinion/editorial guys. Kicking Competition: Bears Blew it.
-
1. We done fucked up 2. Robbie Gould is still available?
-
That is actually...awesome. I have an image in my head of the young area scouts talking about him. "yea, they say he used to be an NFL GM and then went crazy after he was fired after 3 seasons"
-
Yea I kinda of really wanna go get one lol.
-
They're all Cubs at least. :dontknow: And there's 9, and one's even a pitcher! -
ChiCargo Cubs - AKA that bad man can't hurt you anymore
WrigleyField 22 replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I’m pretty sure Houston was mainly a catcher though, right? Mueller was good but had that nasty knee injury. iirc, the cubs used Tyler Houston as a quasi super-utility player during his time with the team. Quasi-super-utility is really something. -
ChiCargo Cubs - AKA that bad man can't hurt you anymore
WrigleyField 22 replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
They found him passed out drunk in the cargo hold of a FedEx plane? Is that it? I thought it was after his favorite type of pant. -
Damn I was really hoping 5'1" wasn't a typo.
-
Two thoughts: Does Peterman really get to be included with all those other QBs with actual redeeming features (aka why not just say, "Nathan Peterman" ) Heh, two NFC North QBs.
-
Alright no April Fools shenanigans this time. The Bears throwback for this year probably leaked. https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/look-bears-unreleased-new-throwback-uniforms-for-2019-might-have-just-leaked-early/ I am a fan. Bonus points if they go with the funky helmet stripes too (I'm sure they'll have the horizontal striped socks)
-
ChiCargo Cubs - AKA that bad man can't hurt you anymore
WrigleyField 22 replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
.245 .290 .553 .843 Hey, a. 300 ISO and drop him in this juiced ball environment? -
Yea the Bulls aren't actually dog horsefeathers at drafting so it makes sense they want to trade the pick.
-
As of the Cards weekend she was still his walk up music so I don't think so.
-
Maybe she just snores or leaves her toenail clippings around.
-
I've never been divorced, but c'mon normal people don't just stop going to work.
-
I think getting rid of max salaries could make things a lot more interesting. We've seen how important superstars can be, but right now they can only be a certain % of the cap. If someone like Lebron knows he can get a max offer from every team in basketball, of course him and all the other stars are going to flock to the big markets. But if a Detroit or a OKC or whatever wants to throw 75% of their cap space at him, could make the decision a little different. I've long liked that idea but realistically the vast majority of voting player association members benefit greatly with the max salary. And the owners aren't gonna get rid of the cap.
-
Basketball's real issue is that nothing in draft or FA can really solve for parity issues. The best thing they could do in that regards is a premier league style club demotion scenario and let crappy teams loan out star players as well.
-
That still induces a pretty good incentive to tank really hard for a good chunk of the season. Isn't the worst team still not mathematically out of it until like February usually?
-
Before we go too crazy are we sure "has been guilty of inappropriate marital conduct which render further cohabitation impossible." actually means anything specific and bad?
-
Julia = Cindy What if Dave Martinez = Dave Martinez in this analogy?
-
Is this common for two concurrent proceedings to happen like this?
