well, a - it's just one stat... like looking at obp on it's own without looking at slg. it's not like it's some all encompassing composite performance metric. and b - yes, obviously, preseason stats are meaningless, especially against the competition he mostly faced, but it's still cool to see the trait everyone raved about him translate directly into his performance to the point that he was the best of any qb No no no no no no Looking at this stat is nothing like looking at OBP on its own w/o SLG. when i made that post, i had no doubt in my mind that you'd make this exact reply. the point is that there's a lot more that goes into how good he is and how bad those guys (sans jameis) are than just the one stat. it's not a catch all and neither is obp. obviously, outside that basic common relationship (that it's only one aspect and not a composite measurement of performance), OBP is much more a corollary aspect of being a good baseball player than this completion percentage is for a QB. but the point is while those guys may have been very accurate, they still could've been garbage by throwing a bunch of 2 yard passes to achieve it, while mitchell was making throws of a pretty high degree of difficulty. (for the record, there are occasionally extreme cases where a baseball player will have a good obp and still be horrendously shitty. see jeff blauser 1998. nobody remembers that he still managed to have a .340 on base that year.) edit - (no idea where i was going with that "people are" in the quote below lol)