Okay then, so why would a guy, Depodesta for example, be a better choice? Do you think Depodesta recognizes the need for a balance of two worlds? Wasn't he instrumental in cutting a lot of Oakland's scouts? Seems to me that he may not recognize that balance either. I am in total agreement with you though. You need to look at both, and then try and make the best decision. I'm not the one who suggested DePo(or anyone for that matter). I will say that given that much of the stats/scouts thing is stats fighting for market share(for lack of an appropriate term) in terms of acceptance by front offices, that I would prefer that the head be a more stat-oriented person. That way since most of baseball's executive infrastructure is made up of scouts, "baseball men", etc., a check and balance situation can occur with someone who holds a differing POV being at the top.