cwood218
-
Posts
598 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by cwood218
-
Bears Week 3 at Colts: Sunday at noon on CBS
cwood218 replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
Meanwhile Daniel Jones is 10/11 for 101 yards -
Bears Week 3 at Colts: Sunday at noon on CBS
cwood218 replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
OMG! -
Bears Week 3 at Colts: Sunday at noon on CBS
cwood218 replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
Bo Nix 12/14 117 yards -
Who pays for cable anymore? TV Show, Movies, News, Sports. everything is free on the internet if you know where to look. I mean so I' hear 🫣
-
Bears Week 3 at Colts: Sunday at noon on CBS
cwood218 replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
It looks like the green part of the Wisconsin map correlates to the highest percentage of brother sister marriage in the state. -
My view is not based on just one team getting value just one time. I'm saying never draft them in the first round. I'm fine with rounds 3-7. Really nervous about Round 2 but not ruling it out. I wasn't claiming otherwise. I was pointing out the asset management they used to get that run game production. Absolutely, but it's much easier to consistently "Moneyball" that value out of a stable of RB's in a rotation then it is at the more critical positions. If you used a first round pick on said RB then you have shot yourself in the foot without knowing it. One of the many more important factors in the value a team gets out of the running game is their OL. In fact "who" you have at running back is at or near of the bottom of that list of factors. The difference, if there is one, of the "who" is small enough that it is never worth using a first round pick on the RB position group. Also, you absolutely never over spend on your cap space for one. The running back you draft after the first round, or sign as a UDFA gets used for up to 4 years. If they are cheap enough you could resign them. Otherwise let them walk.
-
I wonder how this effects the Bears chance of getting the top pick in round 2. I was really counting on Young being the gift that keeps on giving.
-
And yet, although it may take a miracle, they still have a shot.
-
Oh crap starting at the 6. On a positive note at least 3rd down won't be worse than 3rd and 16.
-
stop effing running horizontally.
-
Right or wrong, I understand this challenge. But because or the way the challenge rules work, it just multiplies the stupidity of the first one.
-
Punting is winning.
-
only one foot in
-
About dam time
-
It feels like it's 21-3 instead of 13-3 right now.
-
Jesus, the one time they get pressure.
-
The throw he made from what looked like the inside of a phone booth was impressive.
-
Fields today 117 yards passing. Caleb 1 drive 55 yards passing.
-
Caleb is unafraid of the orange jersey curse.
-
nice
-
I started laughing when the announcer called a 56 yard FG attempt a chip shot. Then it was drill right down the middle with plenty of distance to spare.
-
Those jerseys should be illegal.
-
Gotta think at least Texas will jump them. Being #2 and winning 56-7 or whatever the score was.
-
Yes, as I wrote in the post above there are exceptions. ( 1 of 1 ) Bears - yes ( 1 of 3 ) Redskins - yes ( 2 of 3 ) Redskins - No ( 2 of 4 ) Giants - Yes ( 2 of 4 ) Giants - No I never said teams couldn't have production from one or a group of RB's. If you get one stud like Terrell Davis for a sixth rounder then excellent. if you spend a second rounder for two years of Clinton Portis fine. If you sign John Riggins as a free agent fine. Especially since there was no salary cap then. Otherwise use less valuable draft picks ( never a first rounder ) or UDFA's or trades or sign free agent's. Maybe it's mainly one back maybe it's a committee approach like the teams mark with a no above. Also, after the salary cap started in 1993 ( or 4? ) be cheap with free agent RB's.
-
Wait, seriously, are you just frustrated by their current level of play and really mean not "Michigan" good, Or do you mean "losing to Indiana" not good?
