They got 4 of the their top 7 but it was 2, 3, 5 and 7 or some combination like that. They didn't even get #1. I saw them saying this on ESPN and it's a stupid way of making what the Mets gave up look better when what they gave up was not at all a steep price. (By the way, I'm tired of seeing the media say the Mets paid a steep price for Santana. They didn't. Quantity isn't quality. Quit saying it.) Not sure if there is a metric to grade each teams top 7 or even top 10, but wouldn't the Mets be pretty far down the list as far as best "top 7's" in baseball? Surely, to get those same top prospects from the Yankees or Boston would have been a much nicer looking package, IMO. Oh hell yeah. That's exactly what I was thinking too. If that's 4 of their top 7, then their minor league system must be pretty bad. I've heard some others say that this was possibly the 4th best offer the Twins received too. I wonder if the better 3 offers were all from A.L. teams -- which might make sense just to get Santana out of the A.L. I don't understand the logic behind taking a lesser package to make sure he leaves the league. So he doesn't match up against you (or at least not as often). I wasn't saying it's a great idea, I'm just trying to figure out why they would take a lesser package.