It isn't logical to pick and choose which games "count" towards team totals. The blowouts are as much a part of the team's performance as the one run losses. If the data showed that, over the long term, a team that tends to lose lots of one run games while outscoring opponents over will continue to lose, you'd have an argument. But while it is possible that the Cubs' poor play in one run games could continue, you haven't proven that those games are any more predictive of their future performance than their overall efforts. If you can show statistical evidence that those losses were more predictive, and not mostly up to chance, I'd like to see it. I know, but the Cubs have not been winning according to what the overall stats say they should. Do you really think with this BP we're going to start winning close games late? I'm certainly not seeing it, although I'd love for it to start happening. I can show you the lack of holds from the BP. We don't have anyone near the league leaders in that category. If the BP can't hold teams, why would they suddenly start winning one-run close games? I'm sure you acknowledge the BP has been weak this year, correct?