For the millionth time, it's a matter of degrees. Barrett was below average in most defensive aspects and occasionally made some dumb decisions. He was also one of the best offensive catchers in baseball. Kendall is physically incapable of throwing anyone, anyone, out on the basepaths, and at his best he provides plus OBP with zero XBH. They are different situations. I actually think Kendall is a better "receiver" than Barrett. I also trust his leadership more, which is crucial in a catcher. He'd better have leadership coming out of his ears for it to be worth turning every walk and base hit into a double for our pitchers. Don't be ridiculous. That may be the worst exaggeration on this board all week. I will apologize if someone can produce the stat which backs this up. You don't make your case very well when you make silly statements like this. His CS% as a Cub is pretty easily the worst of any catcher who's gotten regular time(save Josh Bard, and he's catching several of the most notoriously "slow to the plate" SP in baseball). He's given up 50 steals in 47 starts. More than once a game teams are taking a free base off of him, and he throws out a pathetic < 10% of them. It's not an exaggeration to say that Kendall's presence compared to Soto is going to cost the team multiple bases, considering in his short stint Soto has been 3 times more effective throwing people out. And what were Barretts numbers throwing out runners this year? To be honest I'm not getting the focus on comparisons with Barrett. Who cares? We weren't 3 wins/losses away from clinching back then, it's not the same situation. With Barrett, no matter how you felt about the guy there were many, many games left to be played where he could possibly play better, or worse. Now it's all about who will give us a better chance to win over the course of 4 games. That's just completely and totally different, so digging into someone for a not treating this situation the same as the Barrett situation rings hollow to me. Does Kendall really give us a better chance in the short term, regardless of matchups, just because he is more experienced than Soto? That's the question. And to me the answer is clearly no.