i have a feeling there is going to be a lot of peolpe proven wrong next season by Dempster when excels again with regular work. He is a converted starter who rusted away last season after a good first run as a closer and doing well as a reliver. Wuertz Eyre Howry Wood Dempster crazy good. Spending $20M on the bullpen is a serious misapplication of funds unless your overall budget looms around $200M. Basically, I can't find any way to believe that a bullpen represents more than 15% of any good team's value. Take the standard breakdown of the contributions into offense, defense, starting pitching & bullpen. How many you score is roughly 50% of the game (I've read some decent arguments that it represents slightly less than that, though). That leaves 50% to split amongst the pitching and the defense (components of preventing runs, of course). Let's be generous and say that pitching accounts for 40% of the 50%. The question that remains is the allocation of value between starting pitching and relief. Now, on a pure innings basis, starting pitching in baseball these days accounts for around 2/3 of the innings (a touch more than that, last I looked). So a straight division of the pitching value would put the relief core at 13%. Some would argue that number should be higher because dollars allocated to late inning relief can be used in higher leverage situations. But I would argue the opposite. ** warning -- gut feel, unsubstantiated claim alert ** My guess is that teams post a really good winning percentage in general if they 1) score first and 2) hold a two run or better lead coming out of the sixth inning. In other words, my claim is that more games are won and lost in the first six innings than in the last three. I wish I had more time to delve into this claim to find whether it is true or if I'm off on my thinking here. But to get back to the original point, there's no way I'd spend more than 10-13% of my budget on relief unless I was getting a WHOLE bunch of really cheap, really good production somewhere else. But another reason I wouldn't blow that percentage on the pen is that I think that's one of the easiest areas of the team to get some quality, cheap production. Oh yeah, and big money relievers are among the most unpredictable investments in the game. Pitchers in general are the most unpredictable things in the game. If the Cubs payroll next season reaches 115 million which seems likely to happen next season they shouldn't have a problem filling holes with the money left. Murton and Hill most likely will be part of next seasons team and are good vaules. Barrett is also a steal at his current salary. The Cubs next season have a chance to have a dominating bullpen along with a very strong rotation. Zambrano Schimdt/Zito/DM Hill Miller Prior Too me it doesn't matter where you spend the money as long as you get results. Last year Howry and Eyre got results and thats why so many teams came calling July 31 looking to see if the Cubs where willing to deal. Dempster was almost perfect his first stint as a closer and has the stuff to rebound next year when he should be seeing regular work. Wood is a huge luxury to have next year if he can prove he's healthy out of the pen.