Jason Ross

Just like you draw it up.

TUCK!!!!!!!

Carson Kelly - set up man?

Give em' credit - theyre efficient.

Me, who last saw the score after Busch's single to make it 7-1

With Mule, he looked good. Slider was snappy, fastball was sitting 94-95mph into the fourth. He wasn't missing wildly like he had been, there's been leaps and bounds better. No stat-cast, and I wasn't tracking whiff% as I went, so hard to report on that. FG has him on a 13.9% swinging strike% on the season which is better than last year. So some better signs there. I would say on the control thing, Wiggins and Mule are examples of pitchers who struggled heavily with throwing strikes at times and both looked controlled last night. I do think there's a bit of a misconception when we talk stuff and velocity and that velo is much like power; guys who sell out for power are giving up something else usually. There are examples of those who don't, but most of those are the elite hitters. Same can be said for pitching. People want these unicorns of velo and control (don't we all) but sometimes don't remember how a pitcher is generating that power. It can come from size (which is harder to create pitch consistency. The more human there is to control, the less easy it is to control all of it), mechanics (which usually requires sell out) or just over whelming movement (which is harder to control in and of itself). Basically, there's a give and a take, With K's will probably comes walks and visa-versa, It's not always but it's a probable trade off. I do think there's some progress being made with Wiggins and Mule so far. I won't say it's forvever or all the way fixed, we're still early and I think each pitcher needs to prove it longer and at higher levels. But I'm pleasantly surprised with what I've seen. On the length - I do think the Cubs are giving more leeway. I've got some recent examples in the article, but Horton, Wiggins and Mule in the last two days would have all probably not come back out for their last inning last year. I sadly don't have PC's, but I do have hitters faced, and the Cubs are letting their pitchers see more hitters right now and they're giving them some run way. I noticed myself convinced the last two days each pitcher's game was done...and each came back.

I thought he looked great. He was mechanically clean and overpowering. He threw 51 of 75 for strikes. Sadly, with it being High-A I'm going off vibes, feels, and the eye test (I watched most of his start last night on a split screen with Myrtle Beach and Mule going), so I can't give you any of the super fun data-stuff. That said, he looked every bit as good as the line last night IMO. (Also, on the length, last night got me into article mode. I'll have something coming out shortly on it, but the answer is definitively yes, Cubs' young pitchers are seeing more batters and more innings. I'm fully convinced it's not an accident)

Generally speaking, no. He's a career 40% ground ball guy. However, this year he's running a GB% 10% lower and I would classify that as approaching "fly ball territory". He's thrown his 4-seam far more this year and his sinker far less, so it may not just be a function of sample size. The Cubs are one of the highest 4-seam-fastball usage teams, so this change feels intentional. Whether or not he leans into the fastball or the sinker today could be a function of game plan or keeping with what is working.

I would guess as of right now, he's more "age over skill". He's a Myrtle Beach repeater, is 22-years old, and isn't a new-signing. That doesn't mean he has to be, but he probably has to do more than have two strong Myrtle weeks to break out of that moniker. If he can continue this type of a breakout at South Bend and end up in Tennessee we'll have to re-evaluate him.

Random observation, and please, someone either agree or disagree with me: does it seem as though Cub pitching prospects are going longer than they have in the past? Mule went back out for a 5th but got over 70 pitches. Horton went 5 yesterday. Wiggins went 5 and 70 pitches today. In past year, the Cubs top pitching prospects went more 3-4 innings, especially at the dawn of the season. Yet, this year, it feels like we're getting more IP and more pitches in general. Maybe a Zombro thing? Or maybe I'm just imaging things.

This guy is the real deal. I'll say it now: at the end of the year, I think there's a real chance he will be a top-10 organizational guy across the board with room to be a bit higher. This was a grade-A PA all-around and his swing has come so far in a short amount of time.

Wiggins cruising. 4IP, 6K, 2BB, 1ER Mule looking strong, 2 IP, 1 K, 0 H, 0 BB

It was less extrapolating and more a point of style. Horton is a pitcher who certainly throws a significant amount of his pitches in the strike zone and while I don't know if that will be 55%, or 53% or 52%, I don't expect that the general style of Horton will change drastically any time in the near future. It's who he is at this point. When it comes to the other options, until the Cubs make an external move, at least one of Rea/Wicks/Assad will have to be in the rotation as is. My example was for another injury to occur - meaning only two would remain (in theory, the two the Cubs would be less high on compared who whichever was in Steele's spot). I don't expect the Cubs to realistically make an external move for a while (based on how team have handled trades and the deadline since playoff expansion) so I doubt that the dynamics change much. Ultimately, I expect he'll get some run in the rotation. The Cubs went with Ben Brown in a somewhat similar manner last year and I think the Cubs internally (reading between the lines on Mooney's article today) are pretty high on Horton. I think he'll be more of a "here for a good time, not a long time" option with the inning limitations, but I think the Cubs would like to get a look at what he can add to the rotation a bit in 2025 as they enter next season. Call it a gut feeling if you will.

I think he'll probably see innings in the BP - either earlier or later - but I do think that he will also see time in the Cubs rotation, even if just a handful of starts. He was able to get through ~70 pitches yesterday sitting still at 95mph. It's certainly less than the 97-98mph he was hitting in his first 30 pitches regularly, but he was able to get through five. He's a pretty high-strike-frequency pitcher as well - yesterday he was at 55% in-zone pitches. Shota Imanaga averages just under 55% of his pitches in-zone this year, for a point of comparison, which is 20th of 137 qualified pitches in terms of how often he throws strikes. Ultimately, with extra conditioning and another 3-5 starts, I think we'll see that stamina increase to the 85 pitch range. For a high strike frequency pitcher, that's probably enough to get him through five more so than a less frequent strike thrower. I do think that he'd probably be someone who would be capable of getting through 5+ innings even if the Cubs have reservations of how many pitches he can throw in a game. And with injury and ability, I'd be surprised if the Cubs didn't turn to him at some point. My best guess is that sometime in May to June, Mathew Boyd of Ben Brown will go down for a hot minute (they just have the two longest injury histories, but it could be any of them). Cade Horton will be the guy they insert then; he'll have his arm built up and being that it's earlier in the year, he'll get the runway. If he makes, say, 8 starts (utilizing off days and extra rest) at around 4-5 innings a piece, he'll probably be around the 30-35+ IP mark with the Cubs and probably in the 75-90 range in total. Once pitcher X is back, Horton slides back to the BP for the conclusion of the year, and finishes around 100-120 IP. It would allow him to ramp up, build up innings but then slide into a more controlled and less volumized role as the year concludes. And allow the Cubs to strengthen the pen into October and (hopefully) beyond.

I'd guess a Jordan WIcks for Luke Little swap incoming.

I think there's a bit of a balance that the Cubs need to go through. On one hand, you want to ensure that Horton isn't wasting needless innings in Triple-A, while at the same time, you don't want to promote him to say you promoted him. Ultimately, I believe the Cubs will go down one of two paths: 1. There is another injury in the rotation. Be it to Brown, Taillon...someone, which necessitates another addition. Wicks may or may not replace Rea on his own, but I think Horton would be pressed into service. The earlier this happens, the less likely Horton is to finish the year in the rotation, however. 2. Horton builds innings in Iowa, and then joins the bullpen for the season. We have seen successful BP to SP transitions in the past (Spencer Strider is a good example, and actually a decent parallel to Horton, IMO) and the Cubs probably need help there still. Yesterday was a good example that the Cubs BP still feels...short. Palencia, Little and Roberts are potential sore spots. Horton could stay on "high alert" for an injury over the next two months and log 50 or so innings, and then be capable of still eating 70 innings in Chicago out of the BP. A few piggy backs and starts mixed in, but he could eventually be apart of a Horton-Hodge-Pressley "shorten the game" tandem come September/October. This probably allows the Cubs the most consistent action to Horton, even if it means more BP time. You can still get around 120 innings from him this way, and he'll still be ready for a rotational spot next year. There has to be a balance of what's best for the Cubs and what's best for Horton and his development. As much as I want to win, I want Cade Horton to be a useful part of the rotation for more than just 2025. Right now, he's not there yet. He really is gassing around 50 pitches. He needs more stamina and his consistency aint there yet. All three of his walks yesterday were in part of him unable to get the final whiff - a few foul balls that could have been commanded that much better were the difference between K's and walks. And they added a few pitches each PA. I think earliest we'd see him is May.

Absolutely. I'd like to see Cade flash a third pitch a little more often than he has - yesterday he went almost exclusively fastball-slider through four innings. He did get one of his five whiffs on a curveball in the 5th inning - nice pitch. The Cubs have had success with two-pitch guys (Steele and Brown) so it's not an impossibility, I'd just like to have something else if need be.

I guess I would ask this: 1. What was a reasonable outcome for 2021? 2. What was a reasonable outcome for 2022? If we want to say "it's unreasonable for the Chicago Cubs to have to tear everything to the ground a second time in a decade" I would agree with that. However, that is almost assuredly a Tom Ricketts complaint, and not one that should be held against Jed Hoyer. I do not believe it was reasonable to hold Hoyer to a standard of putting together a playoff team with the limitations placed upon him in 2021, and subsequently, that he was unable to immediately replace Darvish, Baez, Byrant, Rizzo, Schwarber, etc within just a few months. I'm more willing to discuss beyond that but I really think those two years, any reasonable expectation that the Cubs were any better than the Brewers is an unfair bar to clear.

Yeah, I do think that's probably fair to a degree. With that said, I'm not sure it's entirely fair, either. Jed came into a situation in which Ricketts really cut budget post-pandemic, a team that was obviously tearing it down. They traded their best SP for a quartet of teenagers, didn't make a single financial commitment to any of their one-year-remaining players, non-tendered Schwarber...the team was always going to be kind of bad for a few years. There's probably enough to quibble over 2023 and whether or no the team has put forth the full-fledged winning mentality, but I do think we lose a little bit of context on Hoyer in what he came into on that aspect. You won't win top-5 votes that way, but it's probably not really his fault for not getting past Milwaukee in 2021 and 2022, either.

Last season was a disappointing setback for the Cubs' top pitching prospect. He got right to the doorstep of the majors—then his stuff went sideways, and he got hurt. This year, though, the arrows are pointing in the right direction again. Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images The best version of Cade Horton is a bully. I don't mean to suggest that he stuffs opposing second basemen into lockers, steals center fielders' lunch money or sends mean messages to catchers on social media. No, the best version of Cade Horton bullies hitters with dominating stuff inside the strike zone, and then forces hitters to chase him outside of it. This has been pretty evident dating back to his dominating performances in the College World Series with Oklahoma, when he vaulted up draft boards. It's why I've found myself making Horton must-see TV. The best way I can explain it is, while some pitchers try to go around you, when Horton is right, he goes through you. It sounds like one of those baseball idioms, I know, but it's just the best way I can describe it. Horton just doesn't care who's in the box; he's going to bully that man into submission. The first-round pick was perhaps at his best in early 2024, as he struck out 29% of hitters at Double-A Tennessee and walked just two over his first four starts. He was so confident in his fastball and slider that he attacked with impunity, and hitters did nothing to dent that confidence. Things seemed to change for the righty, however, upon getting to Iowa. His velocity declined; the walks increased; and he started to get knocked around when he came into the zone. His fastball shape was poor. Stuff+ agreed. You can see his 2024 Statcast data below (important note: Statcast data is unavailable for Double A, so this shows only his 2024 season in Triple A). His fastball graded out worse than average. The slider was good, but less than stellar, and opposing hitters touched him up. After five starts, Horton would be diagnosed with a shoulder injury, sidelining him for the remainder of the season. There was obvious concern for the future of the pitcher entering the 2025 season. Was the velocity showcased in that brief stint last year the new, less thrilling normal? Was the fastball shape going to stay that poor? Was the injury a sign of bigger, worse things to come? So far in 2025, the answer to all of that seems to be a resounding 'hell no'. Stuff+ loves the fastball and the slider. The velocity has sat around 97 mph (topping out at 98 mph), and he's generally looked like the old bully he had been. He's improved almost everywhere. But there is one caveat: he's not all the way back. Not yet, The one place where Horton has struggled a bit is with walks. Some of these can be explained away. He pitched through a downpour in his first start, and in his second, he battled some chilly weather. But that doesn't excuse everything. There's a bit of rust still on Horton. You can tell every, once and a while, he loses his control just a little bit. A week ago, it was to the first two hitters; he walked them on nine pitches. In his most recent start, Wednesday against St. Paul, he walked back-to-back hitters in the third. None of the pitches were horrible; he's just missing by an inch or two. However, those miscues are enough to make you realize that the consistency isn't quite there yet. His stamina, too, is still a work in progress. Around 45-50 pitches, you can tell the steam begins to wear off a bit. On his 52nd pitch of the day, Horton, pitching to Twins prospect Jefferson Morales, let a 1-2 slider get just a bit too much of the plate. Morales punished him by hitting it 385 feet over the fence. On pitch number 61, a 95-mph fastball was piped down the heart. Thankfully for Horton, despite an exit velocity of 96.3 on the swing, the ball safely landed in Owen Caissie's glove in right field. Neither were great pitches, both felt more "get-me-over" than bully-ball. It's not a criticism, so much as a reminder of how much time he missed last year and that rounding into mid-season form will take some time. The good news is that the bully is still in there. After a somewhat spotty fourth, Horton came back for a fifth inning. I'll be honest, I thought he was done after 61 pitches today—so much so that I had written that the 61st pitch of his outing "was his last". Boy, was I wrong. Horton came back out in the fifth and had something to prove, striking out his final two hitters to finish the day with 5 innings, 6 strikeouts, 3 walks and just 1 earned run (and hit), the home run surrendered to Morales. The fastball velocity, by this point, was sitting more in the 94-95 mph range. His velocity isn't holding steady into the 70-pitch range, but that later-game version of Horton can still be absolutely fine—at least against Triple-A competition. The stuff really is there most of the time. On the day, his slider had an average spin rate of 2,651 rpm. To most, that may just feel like a random assortment of numbers, but that's an impressive amount of spin that Horton can place on this pitch, For comparison's sake, his slider's spin compares incredibly favorably to another fastball-slider righty, San Diego Padres ace, Dylan Cease. I don't think Cease is a great comparison to Horton on the whole; the Padres' pitcher tends to work in other pitches a bit more and tends to throw fewer strikes. However, Cease's slider has been a Stuff+ monster, and at least on spin, Horton is right there with him. There's more to pitching than simply RPMs, but considering that it's generally believed that this isn't something you can really improve, the amount of spin he can create is a good thing. After watching pitch-by-pitch Wednesday, I really don't think Horton is far from being MLB-ready. The Stuff+ models think he's great; he's dominating minor-league hitters in most plate appearances; and he easily passes the vibe check with his "I don't care who's in front of me" mentality. I wouldn't say he's fully ready yet, though. He probably needs a few more turns to build stamina (I wouldn't trust him past 70 pitches currently) and consistency. I'd like to see him get back to whiffing a few more hitters (he only had five today; realistically, you'd probably want that to be around two times as much) and not missing by that extra inch or two off the plate. With that said, the Cubs should probably start to feel like they could give Horton a call sometime in May if they need to. Horton might not be all the way back yet, but he probably will be soon. When he eventually makes his way to the North Side, I'd recommend making him must-watch TV. I think he's going to be a lot of fun. What do you think of Cade Horton? Have you gotten a chance to watch him in Iowa this year? Let us know in the comment section below View full article

Good job, Pete.

Both pitches were strikes.