Jason Ross

Great minds think alike. I said that his recent trade idea involving the Cubs and the Astros felt like something you'd read on an Astros blog. He's the worst.

There's not better evidence for why Jim Bowden was a terrible GM than to read any article he writes.

This is both infuriating (the Cubs should not be, in any way, concerned with going over the luxury tax) but also interesting (in that they'll still lose Stroman at seasons end) in that maybe they can use prospects to get a controllable arm.

Bellinger is a Boras client. I think Cody Bellinger will sign the best contract, I dont think he really cares where he plays. Now, I think his best value is at CF and teams who think he's a CF'er for the next 2, 3 or 4 years are likely to offer more to him, so it may effect how much teams are willing to offer him. But I think that's a different discussion.

Horton finished 4IP, 5K's, 0BB, 0H, 1 HBP. 50 pitches - 37 strikes. Cruised.

Rojas has top-20/30 (or better) in baseball upside. We're a ways a way still, just 150 PA's into his career in the states, but there's something there.

Yeah, just read about it. I'm not going vegan any time soon, but it's a little cracked to eat a live lizard on camera for the yuks.

Same area scout who was on Horton. Who was following Horton since HS... Big Ty Nichols fan here!

I mean, for horsefeathers's sake, thats the most clearcut version of "this dude should get kicked out" of game I've seen.

Horton looks back tonight. Through 2: 28 pitches, 21 strikes, 3 K's, 0 anything else. Up to 98mph.

Wait...what? Yeah, horsefeathers this guy.

This is pretty poetic and exactly what you deserve plunking Happ like that. Throwing at players is stupid. You deserve this outcome.

Happ swung, Contreras kind of lunged at it, and the backswing whacked Willy. Got him good, probably stitches. Mikolas, I guess, blamed Happ (for what, the horsefeathers knows) and then threw at him...twice. The last had to be an 80mph lob at his ass. Got tossed. What his argument for **not* being tossed is probably worth a study in a college law class, because I couldn't imagine there was anything there to argue, it was the most obvious reason ever for him to get rung.

Oh horsefeathers Mikalas. What a jackals. Deserved the boot.

Man, that sucks for Contreras. I bet that's stitches.

The bold is where we likely differ. I'll trade slightly better baseball today every day, and twice on Sunday if it means a lot better baseball in the relative near future. But I'm not patient enough for that to be 2025, either if 2024 is another one of these mediocre, .500 type "maybe we can back into a playoff" type seasons. Regardless of this deadline the Chicago Cubs need to be committed to winning this offseason. Whether or not ownership and the front office has the stomach for that, is an entirely different conversion.

That I will agree with. With that said, I'm not sure it will change it enough to meaningfully matter. For example, Swanson captured a higher AAV than other SS and he was QO attached, and Turner and Bogaerts each got extremely huge contracts. So while it may change a team or two who's interested, he will be a premium position player in a thin market for impact bats, and I doubt at the end of the day the contract Bellinger signs will be much/any different if he's QO attached or not.

Damnit, lost my draft myself. Quick response: 1. I don't think the Cubs will find it impossible to add players who might help in 2024, but there just isn't enough time for the underperforming crowd to fix their issues and show improvement enough to make me want to pencil them into 2024 conifedently. The Cubs need to turn a corner from being the reclamation team to a confidently good roster. I don't mind them kind of doing that with the BP, because BP arms are just volatile in general, but I think that's where it needs to remain confined. 2. My last piece on Bellinger and the QO is this; the Cubs should never be afraid to drop a contract and sign a QO player. 2nd round picks are valuable, but not so valuable the Cubs should feel the need to keep Bellinger so they feel better about their draft budget. The Cubs also have a deep enough system currently, that losing a draft pick via FA shouldn't change their system much. Plus, we can view the prospects acquired for Bellinger as their 2nd round pick. I'm the biggest draft dork in the world but draft flexibility outside of the 1st round is more of a luxury (these picks just hit so infrequently). I'd prioritize winning.

Well, I think it's pretty unfair to reduce it, because I literally said at the end, that if the Cubs want to keep them this summer, than they can't half-ass it. That alludes to the Cubs adding players between now and August 2nd who are going to help. And, again, I've said it plenty now, I'm 100% of the belief that trading these two doesn't change 2024. They're FAs. I would agree, it'd be weird to talk 2024 and trade two of your best players, but only if they were contracted in 2024. Bellinger and Stroman will be FAs (no way Stroman opts in barring injury, IMO). If the Cubs were going to resign them midyear, well, they'd have resigned them by now more than likely. If the Cubs still want to resign them, than they simply need to offer them the best contract in the offseason. I doubt either holds a shred of animosity in the offseason over it. The Cubs are playing much better, but I think we need to remember that they have a long road to climb, and things are neither as good as they feel during great runs (conversely never as bad as they feel during poor runs). The team is still largely what they've been all year; a roughly .500 team who has many flaws but who plays in a bad division. They can't sit pat and expect to be more. So either add a few players designed to legitimately make the playoffs realistic or sell the two FAs. I can buy arguments on either side.

Cody Bellinger is a Scott Boras client. I don't believe for half a second trading him changes his contract in 2024. Cody Bellinger is going to sign the best contract offered to him. If the Cubs want Cody Bellinger, they need only to do that. If you're worried about the Cubs offering him the best deal, and hoping he'd resign here for not the best contract because we kept him and won 82 games...than I think we have to accept he's not signing here. On the second point, any prospect we acquire may not help until 2025. But they may also make it more likely to trade someone we do have, create additional prospect depth, or may be apart of other trades this offseason to add players for the 2024 season. A QO cannot do that. They're neither tradable prior to being picked, nor will be capable of being traded until next winter post-draft. I'm very much of the opinion that the Cubs need to begin acting like a team dedicated to winning. Now, not later. But I don't think trading Bellinger or Stroman effectively change 2024 unless they're going to resign either of them pre-FA and I think that ship has sailed. If the Cubs want to keep them here this summer, than I'd prefer them not half-ass it.

I think you'd be be very hard pressed to prioritize 2024 at this deadline, which is I think where our impass is at. I don't think you can realistically add the type of players the Cubs need in 2024 now. I think you can maybe grab underperforming players; but 2 months just isn't enough to make these players interesting to me in 2024; that's more of the same of 2021 and 2022. I don't think trading Bellinger changes his status with the Cubs in 2024; he's a Boras client...he's hitting the market. I think you'd need to pay him best deal on the market in December regardless of trading him and I don't think trading him changes that relationship. I think the same with Stroman. I don't think holding on to Bellinger or Stroman through November changes 2024, either. You can still resign both. I don't think it's likely, but I don't think it's likely they'll resign them before the FA period regardless (they've had plenty of time) either. Which is why I'd prefer to sell them now (if they're not going to upgrade around them)...the QOs, while better than nothing, likely won't trump the return they can get. I fully agree the Cubs need to make 2024 happen. I just don't think holding Stroman or Bellinger changes that equation at all.

This is no shot at you personally, but I would despise this kind of a deadline. This is the thread the needle nonsense they've been flirting with for a bit. The Chicago Cubs are a top-5 market and realistically need to stop acting like a reclamation team. Especially if they're keeping Bellinger and Stroman. If you're keeping them you're shooting for the playoffs, and 2 months of reclamations isn't enough time to make a true determination. So we enter 2024 with more of these projects...some might work out, most will either marginally work out or will fail. I think a "hold+under performing MLB" deadline is probably the worst case outcome; it banks on this flawed Cubs roster making the playoffs and it doesn't give you enough time to properly evaluate the under performers for 2024. So you really can create a whole host of new questions instead of solving anything. These feel like trades you make in December, not really in July. So while I don't think they're a bad idea on their own, as a July-deadline trade they feel out of place. Sometimes trades for non-elite-today prospects don't work out, but I'm also not advocating the Cubs buy half a HS prep lineup like they did in the case of Darvish. There's middle ground between 18 year Olds with zero professional PAs and players in high A with a few hundred PAs of data. In fact, the QO play is a lot closer to that (you'd be likely targeting prep hitters or arms with those picks and slot). The Cubs should be able to do considerably better selling on those two and 18 year Olds. I'm not entirely sure exactly what to expect for either, the deadline is a fickle lady and teams can get swept up, or decide to just stand pat, at a whim, so I'll avoid offering names (especially with the Cubs and how they choose MiLB talents off the radar). These can be prospects that are used to restock the system as the Cubs use their prospect depth in the offseason to grab some actual talent. Or players used to aid those trades. The Cubs do have a ton of talent in the MiLB, but it can't be a bad thing overall and can be used in many ways. As stated I feel like the Cubs need to pick a lane for once. Thread the needle rarely works and I think we have enough information these last few seasons to show it might not be Hoyer's strong suit. I'm not sure he's aggressive enough for a lane in which we actually upgrade the team either, but I'm not sure it's to be seen he can't either. I'm very firmly I'm the camp that the Cubs either need to get max value today for the Bellingers/Stroman/Gomes types and then commit to Amaya, Mervis, and a few on the cusp younger players, or they need to add players who will actually support these players to make a true Playoff push. I can't see many outcomes where the middle ground pays off in any way for the Cubs except for, maybe, Tom Ricketts profit lines. It might be slightly more fun for us, but long term Cub success...I'm just not that does anything.

I think that's a fair worry (and one I do share) however, I'm not sure that makes it right, either, if that makes sense. Part of my concerns in general is how Hoyer will handle this. I would say that if Hoyer is concerned with his long term prospects as VP of the Cubs than doing very little but holding his players (or adding a very small minor player like Cron or Candelario) isn't his best bet either. Which is why I really would like the Cubs to select a lane.

I disagree with the idea the Cubs cannot get a game changing prospect. Now, I'm pretty sure they won't be getting a top-25 prospect *today* but the Cubs have gotten both PCA and Kevin Alcantara via the deadline with worse trade chips than either Stroman or Bellinger. They can certainly get a prospect with tantalizing upside, it just might not be today upside. The Cubs do quite well when given the run of prospects to choose from via trade. I trust the Cubs in their prospect evaluations and I think a really good return is in the table. The Cubs should probably choose a lane here. I think nibbling at the margins hoping you can sneak into the playoffs is a pretty good way to finish with 82 wins, no playoff appearance and losing Bellinger/Stroman for comp picks. If we want to make every attempt at the playoffs precious, a belief I'm always for, than we need to act that way to a decent degree. Not selling PCA for a rental, mind you, but it has to be more than "raising the floor" at 1b and 3b(the same rhetoric we got pre-season with Mancini and Hosmer types), too.

Yeah, even more complicated when you have someone like Hoyer in a position where I'm not sure he's on *the* hot seat today but is slowly working his way into one. Does he have personal motivations for eschewing long term for short term worried about his own future? Can Hoyer face the fans and sell those two in the face of some wins over the last 1.5 weeks? Whatever the decisions that are made here are going to be very tough and I'm not entirely sure I have full trust with the current FO in their decision making. They do great, IMO on the MiLB front but their MLB strategies are...a bit all over the place for me. I'll admit being a nervy Cub fan these next 6 days.