dcvalpo

Golden State reportedly interested in dealing for Kirk.

He's been bad for almost a decade now...tonight has been no exception.

Everything about AU's season points to a crazy 4 minutes to come.

Good, the redheaded idiot is there hustling down the sidelines to celebrate with "his team."

Kiffin to the Titans is in the early stages.

"McCowan did better than Jay and the Bears actually won games with that kid in the game"

When will the out-of-retirement Urlacher to the Bucs rumors begin?

"I got two uncles who knew how to mark a deck." Mmhmm.

I think Tucker is gone, based on Trestman's answer.

He's awful anyway. He asked every guest this morning "Are the Bears closer to a Super Bowl than they were when Lovie was fired?" What a loaded question open to wide interpretation. Haugh is the worst. Openly ripped by the afternoon guys on the Score on a regular basis.

Trestman's hair is very distracting.

I almost wonder if he meant Conte...."converted from safety"...

Not everything is "on you" Phil.

Just a guy saying stuff. I just don't see the point of dealing Shark right now...so far, I have yet to hear a name that has the possibility of turning into something as good as Shark down the road.

Kentucky sucks, but Vandy has beaten Ole Miss 5 of the last 7 years. Well aware of this. They have our number, even in our best years. It's a game of dread for us. As a Rebel I'd rather play LSU any day than Vandy. However, against everyone else Vandy is a doormat. Although they've been much improved under Franklin. I know you qualified this with "improved under Franklin," but doormat is still a massive overstatement. Under Franklin, the Commodores have beaten Mizzou, Auburn, Tennessee (x2), Ole Miss (x2), NC State, Florida, and Georgia...that's an impressive resume for 95% of the teams in the country over a three-year period.

Kentucky sucks, but Vandy has beaten Ole Miss 5 of the last 7 years.

And then Vandy promptly crushes them in the Swamp.

The Pacers are not better than the Bulls. It's really close, I think the Bulls are a better regular season team and will finish with a better record this year but I think the Pacers are and will be a better playoff team. I like starters of Hill/Stephenson/George/West/Hibbert with Granger or Copeland/Scola/Watson off the bench more than Rose/Butler/Deng/Boozer/Noah with Hinrich/Dunleavy/Gibson off the bench in a playoff series where only about 8 guys are going to log major minutes. Again, it's really close and a playoff series would probably go 6 or 7 games. The only way they are a better playoff team is if they are significantly healthier than the Bulls. Rose is looking like a top 5 in the NBA player right now. This team is going to be disgustingly good. I get that argument, but Paul George looked like a top 5ish player in the playoffs last year and Hibbert took a big step forward post ASB and during the playoffs last year and is probably a top 3 center in the league. I think they are a little bit better. Paul George is nowhere near the player Rose is. Out of these players, who is George better than? Lebron, Durant, Rose, Anthony, Paul, Wade, Kobe, Duncan, Parker, Westbrook...that's for starters. I like what Indiana has going and I like Paul George, but the Pacers are not the team the Bulls are and Rose>>>>George.

Please tell me that's a satire and I just didn't bother to read the last page of the thread or something, because that's the least insightful observation ever. -.-

I had Marshawn and Zac Stacy and was playing against just the Seahawks defense. Lost by 4 points. So many moments of pure rage last night.

he also can't hit lefties or rights He also comes across as aloof when assessed by focus groups.

Paging backtobanks....

Couldn't have said it better myself, Rick.

they have to play at Ole Miss too. That's gonna be a tough game. *crickets*