Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    94,146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. Ok, 0-2 solid single against a good lefty is pretty impressive
  2. Guessing a lefty to neutralize Busch and Tucker and if we’re so lucky PCA edit: yep. They have 3 lefties ready to take our big guys out 3 more times in this game. And the one righty in that section is 2 for his last 30
  3. Brewers just trying to get Misiorowski to the top of the order again so they can stack lefties against our lefty dominant top of the order the rest of the game
  4. Boyd about to pass their dude in pitch count after he threw 40 pitches in the 1st
  5. And we’re tied and still 1 out Brewers devil magic magically makes our best pitcher unable to throw a strike
  6. Well keep calling those sellers Jed. Not that this means Boyd is bad now but goes to show you how rough things might get the rest of the rotation if Shota and Boyd aren’t on in their starts.
  7. There goes the scoreless streak. Not loving this turn around the rotation for Shota and Boyd.
  8. I’ve only watched 1.5 innings of this game and have seen 4 missed calls
  9. Has Boyd tried not allowing multiple baserunners in an inning? He might find it easier
  10. The Brewers have 3 lefties in their pen, but one threw 19 pitches yesterday. Just trying to game out how the rest will go if this is a shorter outing.
  11. Really smart of this kid to allow all the runs to score on wild pitches and his own error to ensure the runs are unearned
  12. Oof, I know this guy is good but PCA has to have a better approach there if he’s gonna hit cleanup
  13. Yes, and while there is some value to bringing in outside ideas and perspectives to the organization, Jed knows this org inside and out having been here almost 15 years now. He (along with Theo) were responsible for modernizing the FO, building out all of the data and evaluation systems they are using. I agree he's probably not the best but he's definitely better than average IMO.
  14. Image courtesy of © Kamil Krzaczynski-Imagn Images The Chicago Cubs and president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer agreed to a multi-year contract extension Monday, according to multiple reports. It's a seismic moment, as much because of the timing as based on the news itself. Hoyer is working hard to upgrade the Cubs roster he built in the shadow of this Thursday's MLB trade deadline, and this news changes the context of his pursuits. Sahadev Sharma of The Athletic broke the news on Twitter. Last fall, much was made of the fact that Hoyer would be out of contract at the end of the 2025 campaign. For most fans (and even many throughout the ranks of other front offices and the baseball industry, writ large), Hoyer's status has been viewed as a microcosm of that of the team in general. Given the tenor of his own comments about his lack of an extension heading into last offseason—and given the aggressive offseason he then orchestrated—the assumption had been that the ownership group would move on from Hoyer if the team didn't make the playoffs this year. Now, apparently based on the fact that the team is in good position to do that (but without any guarantee that they actually will, in a competitive National League and an NL Central race that is currently tied), the team has jumped the gun on that decision. Presumably, this alleviates some pressure on Hoyer to make trades that might not have been in the best long-term interests of the team, and encourages him to focus on winning both now and in the future. For many, though, it will also read as an early declaration of a victory not yet won—and a questionable demonstration of faith in an executive whose track record as the top decision-maker on the baseball side of the organization is somewhat uneven. Under Hoyer, the Cubs have unloaded the remnants of their 2016 World Series-winning core. In their 2021 fire sale, they did acquire some very valuable pieces, including not only Pete Crow-Armstrong, but Kevin Alcántara and Daniel Palencia. They've signed several free agents to deals that panned out well, and under new scouting director Dan Kantrovitz, they've enjoyed more success in the MLB Draft. Their reputation in that area is improving. Hoyer made perspicacious trades to land Michael Busch and Kyle Tucker over the last two offseasons and has succeeded with forays into the Japanese market with the signings of Seiya Suzuki and Shota Imanaga. He also landed the biggest managerial free agent in baseball history when he signed Craig Counsell away from the Brewers in November 2023. On the other hand, struggling often to manage upward and somewhat stubborn in his evaluations of players, Hoyer has allowed himself to be unduly limited by the budgets set by the Ricketts family. At their whims, he non-tendered Kyle Schwarber, and has failed to land the elite free agents who might have put either of the last two iterations of this team over the top. His signature is a certain baseline conservatism that does not always serve the club well. The thinking in striking this deal now must trace in part to Hoyer's conversations with rival executives about trades that would ship out some of the key players who make up the farm system he tried to strengthen over the last few years. Not only are his incentives and the team's no longer misaligned, but he can now avoid having any negotiating partner try to use his own contract status as leverage against him. If Hoyer (as, based on his personality, we might well imagine he would) would feel unduly guilty about trading a haul of prospects for a high-impact, short-term piece, that internal conflict is now resolved, too. Chicago's pitching development has improved under Hoyer's stewardship. So has their farm system. Yet, they haven't won anything of note under his leadership, and his mistakes in roster building have been major factors in that failure. Ownership has liked his way of doing things enough to decide to re-up with him. Now, based on what he does over the next few days and what his team does over the next few months, fans will get to render their own judgments about that choice. View full article
  15. The lack of mega threads is whatever, but I'm kind of missing it during this deadline. There are like 5-6 different threads talking about the deadline and it takes forever to click through them to find any news.
  16. I thought we agreed to not allow Marlins fans onto the board after 03 and 20. 😀 kidding, thanks for the insights
  17. Agreed, we shouldn't count on him as a "deadline acquisition" but I also agree that he's been underrated by Cubs fans. He's likely a fine option as a 5th starter, assuming like you mentioned, he comes back strong from the injuries he's had. IIRC, as good as Assad's results have been, there were no guarantees that he had a rotation spot available coming into this spring. Possibly due to the high strand rates casting some doubt on his future effectiveness.
  18. Always gotta plan ahead. But I was taking from this "viral" Cubs twitter post earlier this year:
  19. Agreed. But the Brewers could also say something similar given that Busch, Tucker and Seiya are all slumping right now.
  20. I think if the Cubs get swept they should probably sell Tucker before he gets to FA.
  21. I think his price is going to be high due to the number of teams looking for an IF bat and the ridiculous season he's having. He's gonna fetch a price higher than your average rental IMO. Does that mean the Cubs should be out? Maybe. But the thought of adding a power righty bat is so tantalizing. Not our biggest need, not our second biggest need, but given how lefty dominant our best bats are, the fact that 2 of them are significantly worse against lefties, our poor bench options, etc. I don't think the Cubs are wrong to be looking at Suarez. I would just have a line that you don't cross if other teams go higher, especially if those resources are also needed for a pitching trade.
×
×
  • Create New...