If you want some evidence of shady voting, you need not look farther than the vote totals. Not sure if anyone posted this yet but look at the first round totals and then look at the second round totals. In the first round, Tokyo garnered 22 votes. In the second round, Tokyo garnered 20 votes. So you mean to tell me that 2 people who originally backed Tokyo decided to switch allegiances between the first and second round? Also, no Chicago supporters switched their votes to Tokyo after elimination? Nope, those were likely Rio supporters who artificially propped up Tokyo's numbers in the first round so that Chicago would finish last. It's the same with Madrid...after the first round Madrid led the entire voting. Between round 1 and round 2, Madrid only gained 1 vote, meaning the Rio supporters once again voted Madrid in round 1 and quickly switched to Rio in round 2. In round 1, Madrid led Rio by 2 votes. In round 2, all the suddenly Rio gained 20 votes and led Madrid by 17 votes. Guys there were only 18 supporters for Chicago originally. Even if they all backed Rio after the first round, there are still people who randomly switched between rounds. Folks, this vote was decided long before today IMO. Not that it's illegal to do this, but it's extremely shady and demeans the entire voting process. If you guys wanted Rio, just say so....don't pretend like this entire experience is fair and just. I'm not saying Chicago would have won if this would have occured, the wheels were obviously greased in Rios favor. But it could have saved us the civic embarassment. In a way, this voting also weakened the power and influence of the President of the United States globally. Am I taking it too far? I don't know....