Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    95,286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. Teams have been getting screwed because of their geography for years, oh well. I understand how that sucks, and if they do away with unbalanced scheduling, I'm all for bitching about it.
  2. I doubt they'll take a worse hitter and fielder for one less year under contract.
  3. They typically do not like us and it has been this way for years.
  4. Its a [expletive] bleacher report rumor. Stop yourself. It has absolutely no basis in reality. I'm not basing anything off the bleacher report article. Perhaps I worded that wrong. I meant that it would make sense that the Cubs would be interested in trading for Loney, given that he's a lefty and a nice defensive first baseman.
  5. You don't understand the Lions fans hatred of the Bears?
  6. Yup. At first I thought they were going to call off the goal, but the posts stayed in position thankfully. What happens if a player very obviously purposely pushes the goal off the moorings during a scoring opportunity for the other team?
  7. That actually makes the Loney rumor more viable as it fits two of those criteria whereas Fielder is a below average Fielder. If the brain trust is serious about improving the defense, prince probably not their guy. Unless they are willing to sacrifice D at first for his bat which is very possible.
  8. Come on, does the title really need to be "James Loney to the Cubs". At least say its a rumor.
  9. Dunno but I noticed him getting a lot more involved offensively tonight, sometimes dipping pretty far into the offensive zone. Quite interesting.
  10. Honestly, it makes sense he would choose the Cubs over the Red Sox. He's a midwest guy, he'd be going to a team with a very positive atmosphere going on, the expectations in year 1 will be lower. Meanwhile the Sox have a negative vibe going on, and while they are clearly more ready to win, the expectations are a WS title or bust. Also, the team he would be managing quit on it's last manager, and their fans were extremely vocal of their criticism of him when he was there last time. No brainer.
  11. With the win, the Hawks goal differential is +14 which is tied for 2nd best in the NHL, behind only Boston who is +18. Also they lead the NHL in points, albeit with 1-2 more games played than most other teams. The Hawks also lead the NHL in goals scored.
  12. I dont care if he's not playing today......LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU What a 3rd period. This team is decent.
  13. Wow that was one of the worst telegraphed passed I've ever seen. I could see it happening in slow motion. Got lucky there.
  14. He also needs to break Schneider's groin again.
  15. I wonder how Boston fans are feeling about this. On to SOSH...
  16. 2-2 on the Power play! It's like someone flipped a switch.
  17. There we go! Nice setup and goal on the PP
  18. Did the Hawks like take shots during the intermission? A completely different team after a decent 1st period. Getting dominated.
  19. Was it today or yesterday when there was a quote about Maddux being undecided whether he would take the Cubs job or not because of family issues? Interesting that soon after Theo Hoyer has his choice. Either one of 2 things most likely happened 1) Maddux made his choice and the Cubs either hired him and moved along to their next choice, or 2) Maddux was not one of the finalists.
  20. Meh, I'm not worried about preventing scoring as much as I'm worried about sacks, ints, fumbles, defensive tds and return tds. If your league counts return TDs under defense, it would make sense to start the Bears. I'm not sure how they are this year, but last year SD's special teams was the worst in the NFL by far. They were 1st in offense, 1st in defense, and 32nd in special teams. That combined with the fact that Rivers has been an interception throwing machine makes me want to start the Bears D there. Just looked it up, according to Football Outsiders, SD has the 27th best ST in the NFL this year, coming off a year where they were dead last. Arizona has the 4th best special teams this year. Not that special teams DVOA ratings come solely from kick and punt returns or kick and punt blocking, but it is a big part of it. All that said, the 49ers and Bears are 1-2 in special teams rankings, so maybe I'm overrated it. I just remember how bad SD's STs were last year and can't go against that.
  21. /Waits for "Marlins interest was never real, unless it was" Heyman joke.
  22. Lot of tweets within te last 5 minutes saying the same thing but they all could be coming from the same source.
  23. He might still be willing to do like 7 years/$32 mil per year ($224). I would guess that if Pujols were to accept less years, the total contract value would have to be similar to the 9 year offers he gets, because if he took a 7 year deal, he's not really likely to get much money in years 8 and 9 with a new deal at age 40.
  24. So if the contracts were even throughout the length of the deal, they will commit to $40 mil to 2 players next year, putting them around $100 mil for 11 players I think.
  25. That's called extortion and it's illegal. It's not an official agreement, its just talking. If the Red Sox say no, the Cubs can't make things more difficult for the Red Sox other than keep persuing Sveum, which they have every right to do. If the Red Sox say ok and still demand McNutt, the Cubs can't do anything either. But they can discuss a scenario that is mutually beneficial for each of them and keep it between themselves no official agreement. If I say to you, "hey there, I see you have a new car. This is a bad place to have new cars. I hang out here so I'll protect it for you if you pay me 50 bucks. If not something bad could happen, and it probably will." we are just talking, it's not an official agreement. That only makes sense if you have a legal right to destroy my car. The Cubs have every right to persue and hire Sveum even if it hurts the Red Sox.
×
×
  • Create New...