Almost definitely at least one, and probably two, of Brewer, Watson, and Korver will be gone before the season starts. And I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing. We know what those guys do in the playoffs when it really matters, and when the playoffs roll around depth means a lot less than it does in the regular season. I just renewed my season tickets as well. It's going to be tough to get rid of some of those early season games. It's been speculated that all 3 of those guys will not be retained this offseason. The Bulls seem to have decided that they want to retain Asik and keep the Bulls superior front court depth and hope that it limits the dropoff of play from the bench. The more I think about it, it might not hurt the team as much as it seems. No doubt it will hurt, but if you can sign a backup PG for 2.5 million like Hinrich or Andre Miller, it might be an upgrade over Watson. Jimmy Butler will replace Brewer and the Bulls will likely take a great shooter with their 1st round pick to try to replace some of Korver's value Yep, just have Jimmy Butler become a great defender, have Andre Miller take a contract for less money than CJ Watson got and draft a great shooter with the 30th pick. Shouldn't be a problem. There's no way we're going to be able to replace those 3 with our cap situation, what I'm discussing is a scenario that limits the damage as much as possible. JB showed good defense in limited minutes last year, so I'm interested to see how he can respond next year. Won't be as good as Brewer but I think he'll contribute well in Thibs system. Andre Miller is just someone I saw speculated as an option RealGM. He's 36 and was a backup PG in Denver last year. It's not a stretch to suggest he's going to take a paycut from the $7 mil he was paid last year, will he take 2.5 million for 2 years for the chance to play with a contender (at least in 13-14)? I dunno but there are a couple of other options too that wouldnt be terrible. And considering how well the Spurs have done finding 3 point shooters late in the draft the last few years, I do believe its possible to get someone who can be a decent fill in for Korver. I'm sure he won't be as good, but again like I said it's a given that the Bulls are going to be downgrading this year. NBAdraft.net is projecting the Bulls take John Jenkins, who shot 48% from 3 as a Freshman and his jumpshot is rated 10/10 by them with his closest NBA comparison being JJ Redick. Are those comparisons usually huge stretches? Of course, but its not stupid to suggest the Bulls can get a good long range shooting threat with their draft pick (which is 29, not 30). Edit: Also if the Bulls miss out on Jenkins, there is Kevin Murphy out of Tennessee Tech who is an early second round projection and considered a good long distance shooter. Not sure if 42% from 3 in college is anything to write home about but supposedly he has NBA 3 point range. The question is whether these guys are athletic enough to run around using screens and getting themselves open with any regularity.