Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    94,559

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. UMFan83
    Charlie Weis's offensive ratings during his 2.5 years at Kansas: 2012: 118 of 124 2013: 120 of 125 2014: 118 of 128 (Weis only coached 4 games, in which his offense averaged 15.3 PPG - only 1 game against power 5 school, his successor averaged 19.1 PPG in 8 games, all against power 5 teams and 5 of them against ranked teams) Of course its not fair to only look at his 3 years at one of the worst Power 5 schools, but those are pretty terrible numbers and that was his most recent sample to draw from. I do not give a flying [expletive] what he did at Kansas. I'm not sure I'd want him but that is definitely not why. Cool...just an example of his failings as a coach. His offensive stats as OC in NY, NE and KC are pretty mediocre/below average as well.
  2. UMFan83
    Charlie Weis's offensive ratings during his 2.5 years at Kansas: 2012: 118 of 124 2013: 120 of 125 2014: 118 of 128 (Weis only coached 4 games, in which his offense averaged 15.3 PPG - only 1 game against power 5 school, his successor averaged 19.1 PPG in 8 games, all against power 5 teams and 5 of them against ranked teams) Of course its not fair to only look at his 3 years at one of the worst Power 5 schools, but those are pretty terrible numbers and that was his most recent sample to draw from.
  3. UMFan83
    Schefty sort of confirms
  4. UMFan83
    Oh God...
  5. UMFan83
    Never a bad idea to hire former head coaches as your coordinators. I'd guess Trestman does fine in this role. His problem was a complete lack of leadership skills. Right....Marinelli was a terrible Head Coach (though to his credit the talent on his teams stunk) and has been a pretty good DC since then. Trestman has some semblence of an offensive track record. Even with the Bears his first season the offense was pretty damn good. I think he lost the team and allowed the veterans to run wild with the Bears. That won't happen under John Harbaugh.
  6. UMFan83
    He had one source tell him that he was losing the team, and another source saying it couldnt be further from the truth.
  7. UMFan83
    I still would have preferred Kubiak over Fox for some reason, but whatever he didn't want to come here so I'm all on board with Fox.
  8. UMFan83
    Also, the practice that KC Johnson tweeted about was apparently cancelled last minute. The cynic in me wonders if the players vetoed it, but it was probably just Thibs coming to his senses.
  9. UMFan83
    He didn't really say that he's on the hot seat, just that the Bulls aren't afraid to eat his salary. Which could have easily been leaked by the Bulls to send a message to Thibs that his job isn't rock solid. I don't think he's in danger yet...we are talking about an 14 game stretch of 5-7 ball after going 13-2 in the previous 15 games...meaning they've been a mediocre but not terrible (relative to expectations) 18-9 in their last 27. But I will say that its starting to feel a lot like the end of the Skiles era. That team had championship aspirations (although less than this team), had pretty much the same team that lost in the second round the year before. That team started losing and effort and intensity were being questioned and it seemed like the same players that were performing at a high level were simply not executing. Skiles kept seemingly getting angrier and angrier in his postgames and the players just weren't responding. Once it went downhill it went downhill quick.
  10. UMFan83
    That is just amazing At the time, I thought it was a smart move. In hindsight, unless you're more proven or you know for sure you have another move secured, you can't do this. I thought he had the Jets job locked up. If not the Jets job, one of his best friends (at least from what I read on Twitter and heard on the Score) got the Bears GM job and interviewed him but still didn't give him an offer.
  11. UMFan83
    I'm glad we could take them both from a team I don't like and distribute them to my 2 favorite football teams
  12. UMFan83
    We now have 2 coaches on the Bears that would be better HC's than Marc Trestman
  13. UMFan83
    Was a bit disappointed in the ST coordinator hire but this makes up for it and then some!
  14. UMFan83
    http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1ib783R401qgfdhto1_500.gif Marc Trestman and Mike Martz? Were Ron Turner and Mike Tice not available to interview?
  15. UMFan83
    https://v.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/6B2158A71B1169144684715634688_38680437f42.0.1.12059892443795971648.mp4?versionId=eUvuhRIQmyw18gVxgP.eOsZRyBHSEe0. PS why can't we embed youtube/vine videos, etc like pretty much every other forum in the world?
  16. UMFan83
    The Bulls need to prove they can win in the playoffs under Thibodeau for me to have any sort of confidence going forward. They're 17-22 under Thibs in the playoffs in his coaching tenure. Which has what to do with the post you quoted? Plus Thibs' playoff record with the Bulls is skewed by not having Rose for two years. The Thibs playoff record argument is hilarious. 10-7 record in games Rose plays in 7-15 in games Rose doesn't play. Shouldn't it matter that that record was amassed in one postseason, 4 years ago? No, considering that was the only postseason that their high usage superstar played in. The next year the team was completely built around Rose being the dominant scorer. The after that it was built around Rose coming back for the playoffs (and they still managed to win a series), and the year after that it was against built around Rose again playing and being the dominant scoring threat. I would accept an argument that its inconclusive but not that Thibs has proven to be a bad postseason coach.
  17. UMFan83
    The Bulls aren't like the Spurs where they can coast because they've proven good enough to win a title. I will agree that this stretch of terrible basketball could easily be a blip, and the regular season is a bit of a meaningless exercise for a team like the Bulls, but Thibs wants to win every game, Rose wants to prove he is back, this team wants to win and right now they aren't
  18. UMFan83
    The good thing about the bulls is that they are obviously much more talented than they are playing. It's not like we are arguing that the Bulls aren't talented enough to win a championship like we have the last 2 years. Its simply the team isn't playing up to the sum of its parts. Will that get fixed? I am not sure. The effort has been terrible, something is broken in the defense, Thibs doesn't seem to have answers right now. But there is legit hope that they put things together and figure it out.
  19. UMFan83
    This team clearly has issues right now, but do you hear yourself when you get this worked up over a stretch of bad games in January? The Bulls need to prove they can win in the playoffs under Thibodeau for me to have any sort of confidence going forward. They're 17-22 under Thibs in the playoffs in his coaching tenure. Which has what to do with the post you quoted? Plus Thibs' playoff record with the Bulls is skewed by not having Rose for two years. The Thibs playoff record argument is hilarious. 10-7 record in games Rose plays in 7-15 in games Rose doesn't play.
  20. UMFan83
    Team is tuning out Thibs, it's pretty clear at this point. Defense is bad, energy is bad, rebounding is bad. This really isn't a very good team. Isn't a prolonged stretch of suckiness bad enough without this kind of sizzling hot meatballin'? Chris Sheridan had one source tell him that the Bulls have indeed quit on Thibs but another tell him that is completely untrue.
  21. UMFan83
    They are 2 games into a 12 game stretch where their opponent's average RPI is 22. If they come out of that stretch at .500 overall in the conference, it would be a miracle (would mean they went 5-7 over those 12 games). I guess my mantra for DePaul basketball is "one game at a time". If I look at all the Seton Hall and Villanovas on the schedule, it gets depressing. If DePaul didn't blow those games to Loyola Marymount and Lehigh, they'd actually have an outside shot for an NIT bit (just given where they are now, not necessarily that I believe they will get there) at 12-7 (4-2) and 3 Top 35 wins. Regardless its just fun to be actually discussing DePaul basketball in a positive light for a change. They were never really in the Lehigh game, but they should have beaten Loyola Marymount and ISU. Yeah, being mediocre is a cause for celebration, which is both encouraging and sad as hell at the same time. Yeah I know they weren't in the Lehigh game, it was just a game DePaul should have freaking won.
  22. UMFan83
    The Patriots definitely deflated some balls yesterday. What can they even do to them, other than a fine and maybe a draft pick taken away? That's it, if what I'm reading is correct.
  23. UMFan83
    They are 2 games into a 12 game stretch where their opponent's average RPI is 22. If they come out of that stretch at .500 overall in the conference, it would be a miracle (would mean they went 5-7 over those 12 games). I guess my mantra for DePaul basketball is "one game at a time". If I look at all the Seton Hall and Villanovas on the schedule, it gets depressing. If DePaul didn't blow those games to Loyola Marymount and Lehigh, they'd actually have an outside shot for an NIT bit (just given where they are now, not necessarily that I believe they will get there) at 12-7 (4-2) and 3 Top 35 wins. Regardless its just fun to be actually discussing DePaul basketball in a positive light for a change.
  24. UMFan83
    http://media1.giphy.com/media/TnN8ei3cMolpu/giphy.gif
  25. UMFan83
    As much as it sucks to lose Valbuena, I'm happy that we were able to essentially pick him off the scrap heap 3 years ago and build enough value to be the key piece in this trade from the Cubs side. He's come a long way from being that douchebag that hit a bunch of HRs against us in that one series in 2009.
×
×
  • Create New...