First: Fourth rd pick for Olsen? What's next, Lance Briggs for a conditional 7th rd pick? Second: How can you call a player who has statistically improved each year in the league (39-391-2 to 6-612-8) a failed first round pick? I know stats don't show it all, but they dont lie either They are flaws in his game, but he still is improving as a player. So no, I don't consider Olsen a "failed first round" pick, and thus shouldn't be considered as on. No one is giving the Bears a second rounder. Third rounder - maybe - but they are not getting anything better. The Bears are stuck with a guy they don't need who wants out. You don't get what you should get in that position. Lance Briggs is a perennial Pro Bowler, Olsen isn't even close. Olsen is a failed first rounder because he can't block, can't shed blocks well, is undersized, doesn't have strong hands, has the fewest yards after the catch of any regular TE in the league last year, and hasn't shown the speed to break away from safeties that we thought he would. He is improving, but not fast enough. In Martz's scheme, he is worthless because Martz wants his TEs to first be able to block so that the wide outs can go deep. Yes Greg is improving, but he never showed first round talent.