Maybe on your Xbox 360 or PS3, there is no human interaction between the same players on the same team. In the real world, these players spend a lot of time together over approximately half of the year. They spend time in cramped dugouts, on team flights, in hotels, etc. You want to pretend that no outside factors can effect a baseball players ability to perform at maximum level, I don't buy it. You want to pretend that how a player feels about one of his teammates somehow affects how he performs in a series of situations not involving said teammate. I don't buy that. Nevermind the fact that nobody on the Cubs has even hinted at not liking Bradley. I think you need to read the posts again. I never said that how a player feels about one player affects how he performs and I never singled out Bradley as the only problem with Cubs chemistry. I said that you would be naive to believe that the overall clubhouse chemistry doesn't have some effect (even if it is small) on players. Just because there is no stat that can measure it doesn't mean that it isn't a factor. What is your reasoning for thinking this team has poor chemistry? Can you give any examples of teams who struggled due to poor chemistry?