Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SouthSideRyan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SouthSideRyan

  1. Arbitrary endpoints are fun. What if you slice it to include today's game. Or the games right before that 3-6. You introduced the "pythag holds true no matter how you slice it" idea. It doesn't. The back and forth on this is silly because nobody thinks the team without the inevitable sell-off is a 59 win team or an 83 win team. Pythag may be more predictive than actual record after ~40 games, but that doesn't mean it's a great predictive tool. Our pythag projection dropped from 83 to 75 wins in the span of 7 games.
  2. Except that's not really what anyone's saying. Just that they aren't as bad as their W-L record, because their Pythag was both significantly better and more predictive. That's what Kyle literally just said.
  3. Unless you slice it at the time that everyone was going around saying how decent this team was because omg run differential. 3-6 with a -19 run differential since then.
  4. He's probably our most valuable non-player employee. uhhh lol what Ok, behind McLeod
  5. They want to do original content. They came out with their first show a month or 2 ago
  6. He's probably our most valuable non-player employee. And even including players he's gotta come in the top 10
  7. I don't think id label him a slow starter based on last year's numbers and the assumption that he'll wind up hitting well in the 2nd half this year
  8. FWIW, I honestly think this is not only the bottoming out point, but that next year is going to be the best since 2009. You mean we're going to win 72 games? Huzzah! We won 75 in 2010 Whoops was thinking this turd sandwich PLAN started in '11 post withdrawn
  9. FWIW, I honestly think this is not only the bottoming out point, but that next year is going to be the best since 2009. You mean we're going to win 72 games? Huzzah!
  10. Yeah and over 25 years it wasn't that bad it was typical bad stats use from him
  11. http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11008001/sec-ponders-potential-move-division-iv-ncaa-provide-autonomy Between this and everything else going on, the NCAA sounds like it is on its last legs. Can't decide which of those is funniest
  12. The third "way" convinced me
  13. I think I know someone for this...I will put you two in touch! Not usually what you want to hear from wexy
  14. I wonder if those optional assignment waivers for Parker are a gentlemans agreement to not make a claim or if they don't count for a paternity replacement
  15. Do you have a link to that? I see nothing online saying as much and the site has 3rd party vendors peddling their stuff on it
  16. #PTR I think these MLB Auctions items are all for charity. Well, crap. Don't worry, that's not true. The stuff like the pink bats are but there's no indication this is Barney has pink shoes up there with a note under duties and taxes saying all proceeds go to charity, no such note for this embarrassment
  17. Farce isn't funny when it's true tom. You're killing my twitter
  18. Your Mount Rushmore of _________ is the worst trend in sports talk in the last 10 years
  19. The next time Brett sees "reason to be concerned" will be the first ETA I see I'm responding to something from a month and a half ago
  20. Definitely calls for a code red
  21. I wonder if Derwood can tell us what happens next for Bryant
  22. They've been the only fun things about the Cubs because the major league roster has had a glaring lack of Stanton or anywhere close to Stanton level players on it
  23. A very wise man in Scranton, Pa. once pointed out that the question is whether she's hot, not whether you would do her. That's insulting to Swank to compare her to Dennings. Kat Dennings is just a pasty set of boobs and nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...