Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SouthSideRyan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SouthSideRyan

  1. Jim Palmer was the last HOF pitcher to do it and he retired 30 years ago
  2. I cant remember the last good pitcher to stick with one team. It seems even less likely to happen with the arm injuries now and the fear of long pitching deals. I guess Mariano did it but I cant think of a SP. Glavine. Also Verlander so far. Glavine went to the Mets for 3-4 years
  3. This year it is finally working after two years of [expletive] and those guys only getting older. And they have how much money and years tied up in Hamilton (33) and Pujols (34)? Sidenote: I hadn't realized Pujols had picked it back up. Guess it makes sense given how hot they've been. I knew he had started off pretty well and then had tailed back off. 89 win seasons now [expletive]. Regardless, they haven't made the playoffs since 2009, are no better positioned to win in the near future than the Cubs are, and far less better positioned in the mid-long term than the Cubs are, almost regardless of the financials. They are certainly much better right now, but that's about it. I'd say the odds of that being the case two years from now are fairly slim. You wouldn't trade positions, and you know it. THE NEAR FUTURE?? FOR FUCKS SAKE What the hell is 2014 and 2015?
  4. They have Weaver/Richards/Skaggs/Wilson through 2016. They have the best offense in baseball, and it's not just Trout. Freese is their only starter with a wRc+ below 100. Their big money guys (Pujols/Hamilton/Wilson) are the only ones you could consider "old" (33/34/33)
  5. This year it is finally working after two years of [expletive] and those guys only getting older. And they have how much money and years tied up in Hamilton (33) and Pujols (34)? Sidenote: I hadn't realized Pujols had picked it back up. Guess it makes sense given how hot they've been. I knew he had started off pretty well and then had tailed back off. 89 win seasons now [expletive].
  6. I know that we've all been conditioned to not care about what major league teams do, but they have a much better [expletive] major league team. And they have that four-leaf clover generated Mike Trout And can carry a payroll above $8.54 this decade
  7. There was also that time I found 5 bucks
  8. Grievance with/through who? MLBPA How would he have the right? He's not in the MLBPA
  9. Yes. But I get the sense half of you wouldn't trade the Astros for the Angels right now.
  10. Or his Bulls events that made him mad May 7th of 95 was the date the Bulls lost game 1 to Orlando in the second round. Nick Anderson stealing the ball away from Jordan in the waning seconds Leading to the change back to 23. It's ok Michael, 2 months not wearing 23 was enough of a tribute to your dad
  11. yeah lol at the 20 games over .500 angels. bunch of idiots. if only they had their [expletive] together like the perennially last place cubs. Not sure what that has to do with his post, but yeah, much better to spend like $150M to finish in 3rd place every year and have maybe the worst system in the league. Hey, maybe it'll pay off for them this year, but most likely no. Thank god for them that they lucked into the best player ever at the 25th pick five years ago, but they are not a well managed organization. GTFO. Yeah they probably didn't even scout Trout, just liked the sound of his name. We've been fuckingh shitty for 6 years but goodie we haven't been spending as much money as the angels
  12. Disagree, the Phillies were malicious, the Astros took a hardline and lost He's referring to the Astros throwing Aiken under the bus after failing to sign him by mentioning Close. I've only read about it from the posts in this thread, but they make it sound like it was unwittingly throwing him under the bus vs. Amaro reporting their unsigned guys to the NCAA. Is this a purposeful ratting out?
  13. Disagree, the Phillies were malicious, the Astros took a hardline and lost
  14. Can we not pre-emptively credit our FO for the Astros success in addition to our own as of now unrealized success?
  15. Kevin Tapani is like 50 years old. 5 of him would not make a very good rotation. not when you divide him into 5 Gruesome. You can tell he was alive up until the point he was divided in 5.
  16. BobbyHowry2andahalfmen.jpg
  17. I believe that was also the origin of cubbiebum.jpg
  18. I'm far from convinced Shark would have been given a rotation spot by the previous regime. Them doing it with Dempster when he wasn't even their prized possession makes me think they would have.
  19. Eh? Is this just the theory somebody came up with that just because they said they'd have drafted Appel, it doesn't mean they would because it's some bizarre smokescreen for drafts down the road?
  20. If anyone said drafting in the top 5 is idiot proof, it hasn't happened often. I've seen "If the FO is so good, we shouldn't have to draft in the top 5 to get a good farm system" which is far from the same thing.
  21. Of course, we likely would've drafted both of them if they were available...
×
×
  • Create New...