But it's not that these guys weren't signed due to lack of funds. They weren't signed due to lack of intelligence. How many scenarios have you seen drawn up in the Transactions forum that involve a superstar FA being signed/traded for fitting well within the confines of our budget. It's just standard Cub procedure to sign 3 mediocrities instead of 1 real live ball-player. I agree with you to an extent. I'm just not sure I believe that there isn't something coming from above keeping this franchise from signing top tier FA's to the long term deals they command on the open market. They then sign the mediocre players to say, "well, we've got a 100 million dollar payroll, what more do you want?" But if they weren't friggin idiots and thought that signing 1 superstar instead of the mediocres would make the team better at the same price, why wouldn't they? Unless they forsee a huge decline in the value of MLB franchises with payrolls dropping across the board, there's no reason to be afraid of a long-term commitment when you have a payroll as high as we do.