scarey

Good lord is that frustrating after he went 42-70 for 19.2 points per game in the ECF.

Sounds like you would've been happier as a Sox fan. Personally, I prefer that my team's executives not act like clowns in order to pander to their idiot fanbase. Good to see where you stand, though. Why because Cub fans are supposed to be happy with losing? How is Ricketts giving an honest answer, acting like a clown to please his fan base? And do you include yourself as part of the "idiot fanbase"? The funny thing is that the quote has already been removed from Chicagosports.com and my guess is that after seeing it that Ricketts realized that he made a mistake. So Ricketts owns Chicagosports.com? Or he sent his goons to the editor? Seriously. Take a step back and think about it. What difference would it really make either way? Is it really worth getting this upset about a throw away comment? They are mid season, there's no reason for the owner to get over dramatic about the team so a portion of the fan base will feel better that he's "angry". He has a lot more to lose than to gain by doing that.

I can live with this. I don't care that it turned into what looks like a mediocre start, he pitched well and ran into an unlucky inning. I'm extremely excited to see how well he's doing this year, especially his ground ball rate which I assume means he's throwing his crazy split finger/change up and throwing it effectively.

The Cubs BABIP is pretty much where it should be based on their LD% Why does everyone always forget LD% when discussing high BABIPs?

Holy [expletive]! How did I not notice that in real time?

why is miami going to get much better? lebron, wade and bosh are basically at the peak of their careers right now. the supporting cast blows, but unless they luck into some awesome late draft picks they're not going improve much. they don't have the cap room to go out and sign anyone really good; it'll just be the mike millers and mike bibbys of the world rotating through as their supporting cast. Under the current salary cap structure, I believe the Heat would get a Mid Level Exception that would allow them to go out and sign a quality big man, then continue to fill out the rest of their roster with Millers and Bibbys who want to take less money to play for a championship team. Unrestricted free agents for the Heat after this season: Mike Bibby Erick Dampier Eddie House (P) Juwan Howard Zydrunas Ilgauskas (P) James Jones (P) Jamaal Magloire I understand we haven't seen most of these guys this series outside of Bibby, but they rode a lot of those guys through the regular season. They're going to have to get somebody to take those minutes. And if even one of their big three has a serious injury, they become a completely different team. Also, I think people forget that Wade is going to be 30 years old next January, and he's had some pretty major surgeries on his shoulder and knee. I don't know how many years he can keep this up.

Wouldn't that same hard cap restrict the Bulls with Boozer, Noah, Deng, and a future big payday for Rose? Not if you can package Noah+Deng for Howard. The Bulls must pull off a trade of some sort because this formula is whack. Listen to yourself. You see his signature, right?

Yeah if you're any other team but the Miami Heat. Oh, I know they won't call that on LeBron, I just asked if it's supposed to.

Isn't it supposed to be a technical when the scoring player stares down the defending player?

That is almost never called on LeBron. Only in this situation.

Or we could get a SG that can score and play adequate defense to open everything up for Rose. But your way is good too. It totally makes sense to dismantle the team that won 62 games and had the best defense in the league all because we ran into a team that could exploit our few weaknesses in the conference finals. Yes because the Bulls didn't overachieve at all this season. Defense is great, but at the end of the day we have very limited offense with a PG as our primary scorer. Against the Pacers and Hawks the Bulls have looked pretty shaky offensively. I'm convinced your a Heat troll. Or you haven't watched a lot of NBA basketball. One of those.

That's not factoring in free throws, right? It is not. I'm not on the up-and-up with basketball metrics, so I'm not even sure if that's something you can easily look up. I would think there wouldn't be a huge variance as the successful basket AND made foul shot probably brings it back pretty close when you figure in missed buckets and missed free throws in those cases.

I think he's just not a great 3 point shooter having only added it to his arsenal this year. While it sucks to watch him miss so many threes, it's important he keeps trying to work on it so that it forces defenders to come out to him on the perimeter and thus opening up the key for him to drive into. Also, the efficiency isn't good, but he scores about .997 points per 3 point field goal attempt compared to .962 points per 2 point field goal attempt. In the scope of the whole season, that's not terrible. I the context of one game, it understandably is significant he misses those shots though of course.

I agree that's part of it. I don't think that's the whole story though.

The games aren't played in a vacuum. I don't understand why this is supposedly so crazy. I understand why it's crazy when people say stupid things about how so-and-so team is paying the ref or whatever absurd statement the meathead fans like to throw out there when they're upset their team is losing. I don't think my argument belongs in the same realm as that though. In my mind, this is more like the "superstar" fouls. There's nothing stating that refs give them out. Refs don't gain anything from making that call. Nobody is whistle-blowing on it. It is good for the NBA. When you see Kobe swish a jump shot, you add a touch foul and an and-1 and it's suddenly a highlight on Sportcenter. It's good exposure for the league. The only difference here is I'm pretty sure we all acknowledge that "superstar" fouls do exist.

Having a drawn out, dramatic, and widely watched playoff series improves the reputation of the NBA as a whole thus giving a potential for improvement of many lifestyles. I don't think there's anyone making a phone call to each referee before the game telling them to make sure the Heat lose game 4. I thought I made that clear and apologize if I didn't. I'm saying I believe there is an underlying culture that longer playoff series, especially one that involves two teams that are likely to be rivals for years to come, is beneficial to the NBA. If there's an opportunity to extend the series, even if it's a small influence, then it's an opportunity that needs to be taken advantage of. I may be wrong on this, I seriously don't have a clue... but don't the refs get paid an amount per game they officiate? I don't want to try to sound overly sarcastic or mean spirited, but do you really believe there is a risk of an NBA referee damaging his/her reputation? Again, I don't think there's any phone calls made, any closed door meetings, or any official documents being distributed here. For one thing, the NBA is already facing financial insecurity, we all know that. Secondly, I think you underestimate how much of an impact a long, hard-fought series between the Bulls and Heat would make on the NBA. The NBA is all about rivalries. I can almost guarantee the Bulls and Heat will square off on Christmas day next year. Every time they play next year during the regular season will be a featured game and it will draw ratings. I could elevate the perception and increase ratings across the board. Not to mention, there's 3 superstars involved with the two teams as well as some all star caliber talent to market to the masses. It's something the NBA could really use right now.

I don't think they tell them to call it blatantly in one teams favor. They're not going to make fouls appear out of thin air. I do think, in a case such as this, they influence the refs to give the Bulls the benefit of the doubt on calls in game 4. If there's two players going for a 50/50 loose ball and they make obvious contact, the Heat player will be tagged with the foul. I don't think this suggestion is any more ridiculous than people that claim NBA refs called the games in order to make personal gain, and that one came out to be true with Donaghy.

A 2-1 deficit going into game 4 in one of the highest rated televised NBA playoff series. Let's just say Miami fans will be unhappy with the refs after next game.

That's not what happened at all though. They shot a higher percentage than we did in game 1. The Heat shot a higher % in both games and should have won both games imo. The Bulls had many many lucky breaks in Game 1. We cant rely on luck if we're going to win 4 games against the Heat. The Bulls must shoot a higher % to win the series. What lucky breaks did they get though? I'm going to have to watch the game again as I'm too irritated about Game 2, but the CJ Watson fadeaway 3 is a big one that sticks out. If you can't understand how dominating the Bulls were in the first game after one watch, then don't even bother going back to look again.

Serious question. Are you a Heat troll?

Miss Lippy's car... is green.

It's funny, LeBron can't pull his [expletive] pump shot and draw the foul on Omer because Omer doesn't have to jump to defend the shot.

The ball was on the floor and Miami gets a time out?

They didn't want him playing defense and the Heat using the possession to try to slap him with his third foul.

Donaghy! DONAGHY!