Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. I've secured an onsite CA role for the construction of the new Bears stadium, IF they build it and IF a certain firm wins the bid. - I'm mostly joking, but if it did happen and the pieces fell together, I will be there.
  2. I'm pretty sure they lost that status after the renovation because of how poorly the renovation preserved those colonnades Edit: here an article about losing landmark status: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/644198/how-national-historic-landmarks-lose-nps-status IIRC during the remodel they did everything they could to incorporate the colonnades to maintain the landmark status. End result - a horsefeathers looking structure, so bad that it lost the status they tried so hard to maintain. Also - they ended up with the smallest stadium seat capacity in the NFL. They didnt do "everything they could", they gave it the ol' college try. And its not a bad look overall. that being said, now that the landmark status is gone, they can pretty much do anything they want with the building.
  3. I've never purchased land let alone of this magnitude, but submitting a bid feels like more than posturing to me. it really depends on how much they bid and if it is a sealed bid. But right now, it is JUST a bid and not intent to buy, fwiu i'd love to see a new Bears stadium someplace. I happen to know an architect who specializes in nfl stadiums. might have to hit them up for a job :)
  4. If they level the raceway and build a stadium, they will redesign and optimize the parking and the existing parking wont matter. the direct adjacency to hwy 53 would very likely mean traffic getting in and out will be muuch smoother then SF I do wonder if this is a chess move with the Chicago Parks district
  5. Fields looks small to me for some reason. I know he isn't, he actually has decent height and good/great strength. Love seeing him in a Bears jersey though
  6. And yes, we called the "durags". I hated that term because it felt like I was in a production of West Side Story or some horsefeathers, but not because I felt it wasn't for white people
  7. I'm white and wore durags all the time when I worked construction. Lots of white people do. The only way I can read Brenlys comment is with undertones of racism.
  8. yea, horsefeathers hosting super bowls. The NFL should just build a stadium in Honolulu for super bowls and be done with it
  9. Yup. They also aren't the "neighborhood anchors" they always claim to be when they try to get public funding because they typically are empty shells w/few daily events year round. SF is in a good location for a stadium with the caveats being 1)traffic and 2) the park districts control
  10. Oh really, why? I didn't know that NFL ownership guidelines require a controlling individual/entity. They don’t want the scrutiny of what a publicly traded company would necessitate. ah. Are they *presumably* selling because they are tired of running it or are they just broke? and if its the later, why couldn't they sell, say, 30% (or whatever maintains their leadership) in a public offering to bring in some money? Is that even possible?
  11. Not sure if serious, but they can't do that. Oh really, why? I didn't know that
  12. I wonder if the McCaskeys would consider an IPO?
  13. The state/city/public kicked in a god awful amount to build Soldier Field. I'm sure if the Bears wanted to build their own stadium they could, but why when the state is willing to give you a hand
  14. I'm not sure I like any 3 of those options over the McCaskeys Bezos, maybe, as long as he doesn't move the team Do you mean move the team from Chicago to the burbs? Or move the team outta state? I can’t see any buyer moving the team out of IL. out of the metro area mainly. It certainly can happen, and given the history of the Bears I would def not want it to. I honestly dont want them to move off the lakeshore and I'm not sure what the reason would be other then to get a bigger stadium and field turf. traffic?
  15. I'm not sure I like any 3 of those options over the McCaskeys Bezos, maybe, as long as he doesn't move the team
  16. I think OMC was saying he was just doing the math in his head which is immediately what I was doing. But could be wrong. Oh, I was just responding to the original post that was seemingly making it sound like it's really weird/nuts/whatever that Gooden could be a great-grandfather at 56. I find it extremely weird he is only 56. Seems like forever since he was owning the league in the mid 1980's With all that has happened in baseball since, it seems eons ago
  17. i wouldn't say ironic, more coincidental, but horsefeathers those other teams. I want Fields and the Bears to taunt the nfl for years
  18. week 16. I'm buying tickets
  19. I think he'll be back. I think he's burnt up over Love being drafted, having am MVP season, and not winning the SB. But tough horsefeathers, and he'll be over it come training camp.
  20. wait, what? Dalton is upset? tough horsefeathers No, part of Rodgers thing is no one even told him they were drafting Love, and people are contrasting that with the fact that Nagy called Dalton twice making GB look worse. I see what you mean. otoh, who looks worse, the Packers or Rodgers? or both? lol
  21. wait, what? Dalton is upset? tough horsefeathers
×
×
  • Create New...