Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Dr. Cub

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    667
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Dr. Cub

  1. Yep, only the Cubs. Is it that difficult for the team to find a damn chiropractor in the city of Chicago? I would think it would be rather easy to do.
  2. LOL! Actually the Cubs are -115 and the Mets are -105. Time to call Costa Rica!!!
  3. Anybody know the moneyline on this game? My guess is NYM -38,000. For all you non-gamblers that means if you want to bet the Mets to win, it costs $38,000 to make a $100 profit. I think it's a good bet.
  4. You're kidding yourself if you think this isn't annoying and pointless! Do you happen to have any evidence that supports that theory? Quit attacking me. I'm not.
  5. You're kidding yourself if you think this isn't annoying and pointless! Do you happen to have any evidence that supports that theory?
  6. a gander at the co-sign thread shows that it stops at 30 posts. No need to reinvent the wheel.[/quote] Well excuse me, Mr. I hate progress and new creative thought. How do you know the wheel is perfect in its current form? :wink:
  7. for running on what was probably a missed hit-and-run, and for being called out when he was safe. Intelligent comment. Sorry to disspoint you. I didn't realize we were picking apart peoples heat of the moment reactions now..... :roll: A. DeRosa does what he is told B. You incorrectly attack DeRosa. C. Truffle is to blame. Got it. Isn't this the answer to every problem? no, that would be "blame it on CT" But CT isn't around enough anymore for that to be fun. Maybe we should just make fun of Boilermakers? Blame it on CT!! see, its still fun ;) Only because he knows Purdue is such an easy target. Seriously though, who would go to school there ON purpose? I just want to continue the ridiculous quoting going on. you got it! What's the record? Should we shoot for it? Do we have a chance? We've got a lot of heart and grit; I think we can do it!!
  8. for running on what was probably a missed hit-and-run, and for being called out when he was safe. Intelligent comment. Sorry to disspoint you. I didn't realize we were picking apart peoples heat of the moment reactions now..... :roll: A. DeRosa does what he is told B. You incorrectly attack DeRosa. C. Truffle is to blame. Got it. Isn't this the answer to every problem? no, that would be "blame it on CT" But CT isn't around enough anymore for that to be fun. Maybe we should just make fun of Boilermakers? Blame it on CT!! see, its still fun ;) Only because he knows Purdue is such an easy target. Seriously though, who would go to school there ON purpose?
  9. for running on what was probably a missed hit-and-run, and for being called out when he was safe. Intelligent comment. Sorry to disspoint you. I didn't realize we were picking apart peoples heat of the moment reactions now..... :roll: A. DeRosa does what he is told B. You incorrectly attack DeRosa. C. Truffle is to blame. Got it. Isn't this the answer to every problem? no, that would be "blame it on CT" But CT isn't around enough anymore for that to be fun. Maybe we should just make fun of Boilermakers?
  10. for running on what was probably a missed hit-and-run, and for being called out when he was safe. Intelligent comment. Sorry to disspoint you. I didn't realize we were picking apart peoples heat of the moment reactions now..... :roll: A. DeRosa does what he is told B. You incorrectly attack DeRosa. C. Truffle is to blame. Got it. Isn't this the answer to every problem?
  11. Did Everett actually get to punch Rome? I thought he just shoved him and the table down. If he did get to punch him, then Everett is the clear winner.
  12. Is red paint now a performance enhancing susbstance? If not, then WHO THE _____ CARES!
  13. I think I'd like to see this team start having the slightest bit of offensive consistency before I think they can win a series.
  14. Sorry if it makes me an ass, but this is not a word. My biggest pet peeve.
  15. Would you mind spending a week at my house? We're having old sushi, undercooked chicken, lots of warm old style, and all you can eat boiled eggs. unfortunately our toilets are broke, so you'll have to use a big tub we have especially for you.
  16. Nate Bump would have a similiar situation. As would Peter Pitchersmound. Don't forget Dave Largepileofdirtwithawhiterubberblockontopofit.
  17. I'd do it in a heartbeat. I just don't think the Yankees would.
  18. I always seem to have this issue with your replies. Not only have you repeatedly sniped one point out of several (trying to extrapolate that one point to the entire argument), but now you're attributing a position and opinion to me that I did not state, and can't even be reasonably inferred. Nowhere in my original post did I state 'the Cubs won't be good this year' or that they 'suck'. I don't believe either to be true. Please stop adding your opinion to my position and stop trying to snipe one point of out many and claim it to be the entire discussion. I'm talking about trends in pitching that result in the current record. I'm talking about how these trends reflect upon current management, despite a management change. I'm talking about walks, control, and command for the staff. Sorry, what is you believe then? Here is what I believe: 1. The Cubs have the same problems with walking batters that they've had previously (mostly Z and the relief pitchers) 2. The offense has the same problems that they've had previously (they can't get on base) 3. Their "nerve", "manliness", "stones", "balls", "clutchiness" or "anti-clutchiness" is a non sequitier. If you add 1 and 2 together it doesn't bode well for the season. It reflects badly on one James Hendry, General Manager, Chicago Cubs, National League Ball Club. This is what I love about this site. As long as you can hide your insults in a "I'm attacking the post, not the poster" sort of condescending way, everything is all good.
  19. He was bit by a rabid dog. His hand will fall off in 3 days. Book it.
  20. That's quite a stretch. Am I the only one who sees a pattern here? Tell me why a young pitcher, can't make it out of ST for four straight seasons ready to pitch in a big league game? Every year, he has had 5 months to rest, rehab, strengthen whatever, and he still can't get ready. How do the other guys do it? Please don't tell me he was overused by Dusty, that is the lamest excuse I have ever heard, and was 4 years ago. There are many pitchers, that have pitched 200+ innings year after year, and he has only done it once. This guy is missing something, and it isn't talent, but talent doesn't matter if you can't take the ball. boy, the anti-anti-pitch count people have such a rock solid argument. when he was throwing 130 pitches per game they said it would never end up hurting him. now that he's hurt, they say it wasn't from the 130 pitch games. infallable logic. I love this post.
  21. Lucky. I want snow. It's 55°F here and partly cloudy. Boring! Cold. Sucks. Bad.
  22. See, I don't see the big deal here. There are so many people who are all like, "hey, it's not cool clubbing baby seals!!". With so many people not clubbing baby seals there's probably a lot of extra baby seals that need to be clubbed. So, in essence, Mark in just doing his part for the environment. That makes him a quality human being to me.
×
×
  • Create New...