Not me. If we had LMA, then I doubt the Bulls land Derrick Rose. And I take Rose over LMA every day. That's pretty dumb. Sure I would rather have Rose than LMA but Rose wasn't part of the deal. You traded LMA, who was picked No. 2, for Tyrus Thomas, who was picked No. 4, and some foreign guy who never made to my knowledge. That was the trade. If you have LMA you would be a lot better and while you likely wouldn't have Rose you would have some other draft pick in his place in addition to LMA. That could be Beasley, Love, Mayo, Westbrook, Lopez, Gordon or some other player that is pretty good. I would take LMA + one of the guys mentioned over what you ended with which is Rose and a couple years of Tyrus sucking. And you are under the impression that if the Bulls decided to keep LMA, then would have drafted one of the said players you mention. Considering Paxson's draft history, he would have passed on everybody on the list for a James Johnson type pick. The only reason why he didn't screw up the Rose pick, is because you couldn't screw it up. You had marketable young talent from the city, there ws no way the Bulls would not had pick Beasley, unless Michael was a legit 6'10. There is no guarantee even with LMA the Bulls would have acquire another young player. And quite frankly, crying about a solid, but unspectular player like LMA (who has already reached his peak as a player) is pretty childish. Rose makes players better, LMA doesn't.