I do. He'd cost us a ton of runs in left, which would mitigate a lot of his offense. I know many people are against this idea because of the off-field reasons, but I'm against it because I'm not so sure Bonds is the 1.000 OPS lock that many of you think he is. He's been away from the game for almost a year, he's almost 44 years old and he's probably not in game shape. I think he'd still be able to put up decent numbers -- maybe a ~.900 OPS. But with his awful defense and the other potential headaches, I don't think it's worth it.