what teams do you have an issue with? just seems like they dismissed conf. tourney results in some instances and regular season in others (more in terms of seeding than who was in our out). Tennessee should NOT be in the same regional as UNC. Kansas shouldn't have to potentially play Texas in Houston in the Elite 8. Arizona St. got shafted. also, does anyone else think the play-in game should be between two at-large teams? i think that if you earn an automatic bid to the tourney, you should be in period. or eliminate the play-in game, which is altogether lame to begin with sounds like you only have a beef about one team not getting in -- arizona state. your original post sounded like you had more issues with the teams that got in/didn't get in more than seeding, where teams were playing, etc. yeah, i'd need to look over it more to point out more stuff. the trouble this year is that a ton of teams could argue that they deserved to be in, but they all lost early in the tourney. i guess I'm more annoyed when the tourney chairman says that team A is in because of their RPI, but then says RPI doesn't matter when they left team B out. that, and be consistent about what matters more, regular season or conference tourney. MSU seeded above Purdue? ASU out in favor of Arizona, who they beat twice in the regular season (and finished higher in the regular season)? i half agreed with Mike&Mike this morning with their notion that college basketball may need a more complex (gulp, BCS-ish) formula for ranking teams