last year's standings say different. actually guys like clark, davis, and turnbow have done something...much, much more than cedeno or murton, that's for sure. why should we give the benefit of the doubt to the cubs' young guys (murton, cedeno), iffy veterans coming off bad years (jones, pierre), and guys coming off unusually good years (howry, dempster, lee, neifi, eyre) but not the brewers'?