Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    18,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. how can any play that involves having a guy blindly sprint toward home plate while the pitched ball is heading to the guy standing right on top of home plate be 'not very risky'? a missed bunt, an unbuntable ball out of the strike zone, or a popped up bunt is a disaster. When the batter at the plate is just as likely to put the ball in play with bunt as with a swing. Check that, MORE likely to put the ball in play with a bunt. I generally don't like the squeeze, but with Pierre, the odds are even at worst. but the runner isn't out if the batter swings and misses. and pierre doesn't have to offer at a pitch over his head or in the dirt. i bet his bunt contact % goes down quite a bit if the pitch bounces in front of the plate. if he wasn't squeezing, he wouldn't have to offer at that pitch.
  2. how can any play that involves having a guy blindly sprint toward home plate while the pitched ball is heading to the guy standing right on top of home plate be 'not very risky'? a missed bunt, an unbuntable ball out of the strike zone, or a popped up bunt is a disaster.
  3. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. the squeeze is little more than a show off move for the manager. it's unnecessarily risky. Not with a great bunter like Pierre hitting. It's not very risky at all. . you do realize that he ended up getting a hit, right? wouldn't you take that over a run scoring sac bunt or a rally killing caught stealing? You realize that nearly all of the outs Pierre makes are pop ups and weak grounders right? Neither give a great chance for a runner at third to score. Yes, he got a hit, but it was more likely that he doesn't get the runner hom if he swings away. The squeeze was a good move. if i had to do it with anybody, it'd be pierre. but i wouldn't do it.
  4. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. the squeeze is little more than a show off move for the manager. it's unnecessarily risky. That's just plain nonsense. It's an effective way to score. it's also an effective way to over think yourself into ending a rally.
  5. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. the squeeze is little more than a show off move for the manager. it's unnecessarily risky. You have one of the game's best bunters with great speed at bat and someone with great speed on 3rd. Letting Pierre swing away was just as much of a risk. yeah, that hit he got was terrible.
  6. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. the squeeze is little more than a show off move for the manager. it's unnecessarily risky. Not with a great bunter like Pierre hitting. It's not very risky at all. . you do realize that he ended up getting a hit, right? wouldn't you take that over a run scoring sac bunt or a rally killing caught stealing?
  7. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. the squeeze is little more than a show off move for the manager. it's unnecessarily risky.
  8. why does everyone get so excited for a squeeze?
  9. i didn't know murton had that kind of arm.
  10. i thought the cubs took care of that problem. :-k
  11. that was a rusch-esque pitch by suppan.
  12. yeah, i'm going w/ the astros...especially if clemens comes back. everyone rags on houston's offense, but, like you said, they have fewer glaring holes than the cubs and cards. heck, the brewers offense really only has one obvious hole. I disagree about the Astros offense. Berkman is the only real threat there. Biggio is getting older, Ensberg has been inconsistent from year to year, Wilson is no better than Jacque or Encarnacion, Lane is still a bit unproven, Taveras has little plate discipline, Ausmus can't hit, and Everett's only skill is the sac bunt. biggio may be getting older, but he's still better than miles (and neifi, when he plays). i'd still say he's above average for his position. i'm not counting on either lane or ensberg flopping, let alone both. it's not a great offense, but i feel it's pretty close to both the cubs and the cards.
  13. yeah, i'm going w/ the astros...especially if clemens comes back. everyone rags on houston's offense, but, like you said, they have fewer glaring holes than the cubs and cards. heck, the brewers offense really only has one obvious hole.
  14. i never said the cubs' lineup was better...i'm unimpressed with both.
  15. i see wgn spent the offseason coming up with that fancy new font.
  16. walker just punched neifi in the nuts when he was introduced as the 2b.
  17. I see...so both teams have forsaken the #2 spot... :P The Cards lineup is uglier than the Cubs. that's why i don't think the cards will win the central this year. that lineup sucks. they have five black holes in their lineup (six if you count the pitcher). if pujols, edmonds, or rolen slump/get hurt, they're going to have problems scoring runs.
  18. if he was still eligible at catcher, i would have no doubt kept him.
  19. blanco/cedeno will hit 7th/8th, so i bet neifi hits 2nd. a lineup w/ blanco, neifi, jacque and cedeno could really suck.
  20. i should have kept shelton.
  21. mariotti's gone love this attention.
  22. so is dusty. oh, you said dumbfounded.
  23. alou is going to be a dp machine hitting behind bonds.
  24. but rusch has more experience with being terrible than hill. by the way, it looks like rain here in des moines.
×
×
  • Create New...