Why would anyone trade a 25 year old #1 starter making $512,000 with 3 arbitration years left? It doesn't matter whether you're contending or rebuilding when you have an asset that valuable, you don't trade him unless you're trying to make a deal for someone like Trout. Why? Because such a player would net a huge return and he is still just a young pitcher that could fall apart tomorrow. If you aren't good and you don't have the resources to get better in a hurry, it is at least worth considering. Yeah, there's no doubt they'd consider trading Gray, but it would probably take a lot more than the Cubs are willing to give up. If they could get 3-4 good, cheap, young players for their 1 good, cheap, young player...they do it 100 times out of 100 because they aren't going anywhere. Hypothetically, if anybody could make it happen, it's us. RF and an entire infield seemingly secured for the foreseeable future, we no longer have to be stingy with prospects. I'm not saying that we empty it out, but we have talent to spare. Would a package of: Edwards Schwarber Almora Vogelbach 1 of Villanueva/Alcantara 1 of Tseng/Underwood 1 of Cease/Steele/Stinnett 1 decent quality low level guy (Burks/Caratini/D. Torrez/Candelerio/Hanneman/etc) Maybe throw in 1-2 fringy, big league ready spare parts (Lake/Bruno/Andreoli/Beeler/Batista/Cooper/SCzur/whatever) or even Edwin Jackson, just as kind of a here, 'maybe you can make this thing work again' gesture. Be too much/too little to land Gray and Reddick? Or to make it sound less insane, it would essentially be: -Edwards, Schwarber, Villanueva/Mendy, Vogelbach for Gray -Almora, Tseng/Underwood, Cease/Steele/Stinett for for Reddick -1 more decent low level prospect and some maybe useful junk for a few months of Clippard