Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. The WGN radio pres is saying this?
  2. This move makes a lot of sense from WGNs standpoint. Radio stations tend to use a baseball team as a way to build the brand of their station and raise awareness of its location and existence. But WGN has been around forever and probably doesn't see much value in that anymore. They've got a stranglehold on the Baby Boomers that are in to their programming and they have no need to promote to a new generation their old people stuff. They can probably get another 10+ years of loyalty out of their listeners without spending money. Maybe after that they will be interested in renewing the relationship, if baseball still exists on the radio by then.
  3. I think there are two parts to this 1) they honestly want him to work on some things before they bring him up. If they want him to be a 3B long term, he still has some work to do to clean up his defense. If they want him to play OF, then they'll need to make that move sooner or later. He still has too much swing and miss in his game. I'm sure they'd like him to make some more strides in closing some of those holes in his swing before exposing him to big league pitching. 2) They'd really prefer not to bring him up until at least 4/15/15 to get the extra year of control. If they promote him to AAA now and he mashes there will be huge pressure to promote him during the summer. I understand the logic of all that but, in Bryant's case, I'm not so sure it's worth the extra year of team control for a couple reasons: 1) Bryant will likely have at least some growing pains. Better for him to get experience now in a season that's already lost 2) If Bryant is as good as we hope he'll be, the Cubs will wind up buying out his first few years of FA anyway. Does it really save them enough money vs. the excitement he could potentially bring to the big club at a time when fans are become increasingly bitter about the lack of progress? I'm not saying they rush him to Chicago. I'm saying send him to AAA and if he rakes there then let him try to breathe some life into a pathetic Cubs offense. Why is Bryant any different from any other player as far as likelihood of experiencing growing pains? Yes it saves them money. If/when they buy him out a full year in either direction will be a huge number. And there is no value to excitement for the fans in a lost season. They will gain nothing from having him play a couple weeks in the majors this year.
  4. Gary Cohen and Keith Hernandez are ashamed of the mets.
  5. College hitters please, even if they project to just be good.
  6. Silly mets announcers call Baez the cubs top prospect, "likely to be up this year."
  7. I'll eat my shoe if he bags 40 points next year. But I hope you're right. Gotta believe Stan would flip him for a late-round pick in a heartbeat. he's the one I don't mind people saying I hate and want gone.
  8. And probably just as many who say reliever. Also, it says a three or four.
  9. I love that beat writers are comfortable retweeting/quoting tweets with curse words in them.
  10. It's the NHL, almost everybody is an ex of five+ teams.
  11. he was in an unfortunate altercation with the Mountain, wasn't he? that was olt.
  12. The whole broadcast is centered around the idea that current MLB needs are the most important aspect of the draft.
  13. I think Teuvo Teravainen was recently disappointing in some event but he probably has a chance to make it. He'll be 20 this fall. according to hockeysfuture these are the top five prospects in the system.
  14. "Might not have been able to play" according to the beat writers.
  15. or maybe they are done foreshadowing who they will pick.
  16. This line of reasoning makes no sense to me.
  17. Holy crap. A 16-year old hitting a ball over the batter's eye at UCSD is incredibly impressive. wait, alex jackson is 16? i thought he was 18, and it's apparently hard to find the age of high school players online. He was at the time, in 2012:
  18. Exactly. The Crawford contract is not an albatross some make it out to be for one. It also just started.
×
×
  • Create New...