Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. in both cases they traded away guys whose contracts are up in a couple years for guys signed through the 20/21 season. They also got younger in both trades. This is looking for longterm stability situation, with cost certainty
  2. [tweet] [/tweet]
  3. [tweet]https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/878284205997793281[/tweet]
  4. https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/878281195502551040
  5. https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/878281195502551040
  6. That was not the alternative though, and I'm not quite sure why you, and people like David Haugh, are ignoring that fact. Choosing to rebuild is a viable game plan, but having the strategy in place does you no good when the tactics taken to get to your goal are poorly done. If you want a rebuild, you need very good drafter/developer people in charge, and if you are going to sell off valuable assets you need to turn them into valuable future assets. It's kind of insane that they didn't get any future picks when trading a current star. A rebuild doesn't start just because you've sold off your assets for 71 cents on the dollar. It is amazing how much the incredibly unique strategy taken by Theo and the Cubs has blinded so many people to the actual work that has to be done to make it a success.
  7. taking the path to blow it up and start fresh is all well and good, but you still must maximize your returns when you're dumping and most importantly must have good decision makers treading that path.
  8. This is odd
  9. [tweet] [/tweet]
  10. as in literally? that would have to be unprecedented.
  11. [tweet] [/tweet]
  12. make him desperate to sign an early extension
  13. he played there 33 times last year for the world series champions Okay? Stupid/sub-optimal decisions turning out well doesn't make the decision any less stupid or sub-optimal. You can't play 162 games with an optimal lineup. Calling all moves that are sub-obtimal "stupid" displays an incredible lack of awareness of how a manager has to ride the wave of health, energy and roster limitations over 6 months.
  14. LaStella has no business playing 3B at the major league level he played there 33 times last year for the world series champions
  15. [tweet] [/tweet]
  16. Not really. They won't replace his value with $5m
×
×
  • Create New...