jersey cubs fan
-
Posts
67,893 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
63
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by jersey cubs fan
-
The runs scored number is meaningless. That all depends on where he hits and who hits around him. I don't care if you care about his SLG, just because he can't SLG doesn't mean it's alright to accept incompetence in the category. That would be like saying you don't care if a power hitter only has a .300 OBP, because getting on base isn't his game, hitting for power is. Theriot is not likely to approach a .350 OBP. He's likely to stay in the very weak range similar to what he had last year, which, when combined with no SLG, is completely unacceptable.
-
What you're doing is excusing all of Hendry's past mistakes by saying he had to get Soriano. Hendry never had to get Soriano. This should have been a 90-win team years ago. If Hendry was any good at seeing the value of his assets, and could plan beyond today, he wouldn't have been in the position he was in when he grossly overpaid for Soriano. He could have easily fit Murton into a championship caliber team a long time ago if he wasn't just so incredibly incompetent. Instead, he throws good money after bad by continually forcing himself to cover up his own mistakes with bigger and more expensive ones. -
It's hard to say if it's good or not, my guess is that it's neither good nor bad, as any benefits are offset by costs. I think that as long as a guy still gets ~450 PA, and isn't jerked around into a bunch of different roles, a platoon can be a fine way to introduce a young player into the majors. (I would also think that if there's much hope for a future as an all-around player, that platoon better end quickly, otherwise it will be a self-fulfillng prophecy). I don't think there are any opportunity costs spending $1.2m + $350,000 to fill the CF spot, in general. The cost to the Cubs is likely Matt Murton, or whatever $1-X they are forced to take in a trade of Murton. I don't think it does much, yet. If somebody really wanted him, they would have had to offer Hendry a heck of a lot. If, going forward, it looks like he can't even handle a platoon role, his value will plummet. If he does really well in the role, his value may very well increase.
-
That's possible and it's also possible that Theriot will work on his weaknesses and limit the holes. Exactly. The one of the real points for my original post is that we're stuck with Theriot. Instead of writing him off, is there a chance that he can be a positive? No, there isn't. There's a chance he might not hurt the team too bad, but that's the upside.
-
Yeah, some time. But "some time" does not equate to 3 freaking months.
-
Looking back at his career, Murton was first called up in 2005, and I believe that was when he was first added to the 40-man roster. He played all of 2006 in the majors, meaning he was never optioned, but he was optioned in 2007. That would mean, I think, that he as 2 option years remaining. Unless I'm forgetting about some rule that eliminates an option year after a certain amount of major league service time.
-
You have 11 pitchers listed. Lou has all but guaranteed a spot for Marshall. That's 12.
-
I am usually fine with trading down, and not very interested in trading up. And that is doubly true this year. This team needs quantity of quality, not one difference maker. They need multiple offensive additions, and a body or two on defense, if they want to be successful.
-
Re: SI has us in the World Series again
jersey cubs fan replied to wade's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
To be fair, if Theriot got hurt on August 26th and didn't return the rest of the season, most of us would be content with his line of .288/.351/.376/.727. Its the fact that he "wore down" and "hit" .188/.236/.239/.475 after that date that makes us doubt him. In fact that gives me an idea.... I never bought the "he wore down" line. His line at the end of the season was very close to what one would have expected for a player with his resume, given a full season of exposure to major league pitching. Theriot can make contact with strikes. Pitchers know this now, and pitch him accordingly. -
There is nothing wrong with such a player, ideally, all your players will play that way. The thing that is wrong is when teams focus far too much on that aspect of their game, over the far more important cold hard facts regarding their actual production. A "lazy" 1000 OPS is going to be better than a gritty 700 OPS everytime. And half the fun in picking on grit is just how predictable the praise for the "short white guy who tries hard" has become.
-
Here guys....a quote from Bruce Almight's lastest column over at the herald. That's the reason why they signed Johnson, because of the "grit factor." Have fun guys. You should have your eyes checked, pronto!!!! I read it as Bruce making a joke about the grit, and how the Cubs want that, while pointing out that they also need his OBP.
-
Yeah, I was in denial yesterday, but the more I think about it the more I think Murton is very likely on his way out. I'd still like to see them keep both, but I won't count on it. I'd like to see it to. I think the Cubs emphasize defense, and ignore hitting, on the bench all too often. I just can't see them keeping both, unless Ward goes down, or they finally realize a 7th reliever is completely unnecessary - especially in April, when you almost always have starters going on extra rest, and therefore available for emergency duty.
-
So you make an offer. If it isn't accepted, you say "I still have interest, so if you ever figure out what you're going to do, give me a call." You don't leave the offer on the table.
-
No, that's not the only thing that let it not go on for long. They didn't like doing it.
-
If I still want the house, not necessarily. But I might consider coming in lower, considering the reason they came back to me was because they couldn't find anything better. The point of contention was "leaving an offer on the table." That is quite different from saying, "hey, if you ever decide to sell, keep me in mind."
-
Okay, next time you want to buy a house, put an offer down and let them sit on it as long as possible. It has nothing to do with manning up. It has everything to do with not being a fool in negotiations. If you are the only viable buyer it can be a good strategy. Here's my offer, I'm in no hurry, if you find a better offer take it and good luck to you, but I'm not bidding against myself. At that point whether you say the offer is on or off the table is irrelevant. Sometimes the other party needs more time to realize there's not going to be a better offer. A couple days, maybe a week, sure. 3 months?
-
Yes, the point is they can only cover 1 backup infield spot a day. Teams always try and cover the "what if two go down" scenario. DeRosa and Ramirez have had to leave multiple games. Theriot is not a legit everyday SS. I don't see anyway they go in with one backup infielder.
-
That is a poorly written and completely worthless preview.
-
Okay, next time you want to buy a house, put an offer down and let them sit on it as long as possible. It has nothing to do with manning up. It has everything to do with not being a fool in negotiations.
-
I don't see how that is possible. The only way that happens is if they go with 1 backup middle infielder, and I don't see anyway they pull that off. .... With the normal 5-man bench, if one is a catcher and you burn one on a 1B-man (Ward), that leaves you 3 guys to cover infield and outfield. Either it's one outfielder (Johnson covering all three spots, supplemented by Ward or Cedeno), and two infielders (Cedeno and Cintron). Or it's one infielder (Cedeno) and two outfielders (Murton and Johnson). Personally I don't see why going with Cedeno only wouldn't be just fine. When's the last time a team went into a season with 1 backup infielder? When's the last time the Cubs even considered it? It's not going to happen. Cedeno only is impossible because of the "what happens if 2 go down in the same game" question. You can always throw Ward into the OF if need be, or DeRosa, but there's nobody on that roster that can step in at 3rd, SS or 2B if needed. The smart thing to do is not waste a roster spot on a 7th reliever.
-
I'm going to guess they start with: Blanco Cedeno Fontenot Johnson Ward Cintron will be on the DL and will replace whichever young backup MI plays worse by May.
-
he's been gone more than 5 years Has he really? I thought we traded him in 2003, which would hit the five year mark. I believe he was traded after the 2002 season, which would put him outside a 5 year range. I would assume a 5 year range includes anybody who was on the 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 or 2007 teams.
-
Something tells me he's going to do more than spell Felix against tough lefties.
-
Sure, that bench can hit a little. But it has 1 backup infielder, and there's no way they start the season that way.
-
I don't see how that is possible. The only way that happens is if they go with 1 backup middle infielder, and I don't see anyway they pull that off. Unless they wise up and go to 11 pitchers.
