No it wasn't. Getting additional experience and playing time in a year when they've missed a significant amount of development is an unequivocally bad idea? Are you arguing that purely because of the injury risk or is there something else? Because then I'm going to ask you if no team players should ever be allowed to play in any tournaments whatsoever. Positives: - Additional playing time in a year with less development time than normal - Having that development taking place in a pressurized tournament atmosphere - Getting your player some additional high level coaching he wouldn't otherwise get - Building a positive relationship with that player if he wants to play - Building positive relationships within the sport in general in supporting the tournaments - Building positive relationships with players in general in supporting their guys Negatives: - Injury risk You can make an argument that the injury risk outweighs everything else, but it really isn't 100% clear that is the case. I generally agree with your sentiment and add that even the injury risk is more of a short-term concern, and this team didn't have any real short-term concerns coming into the season. Because nobody thought there was any chance of 2021 success. Anything good was gravy. Short of a career ender, who cares if a guy misses time this year. This isn't a pitcher wasting his limited innings on dumb international tournaments. But I'd also note that the Blackhawks did get a lot of developing time, sneaking into the playoff bubble situation and winning a series. The 2020 season was cut short, but at a time when they were essentially out of the playoff race. They came back and wound up in more "meaninful" games than they would have if covid never happened. The playing time in juniors also basically just cut into practicing with the NHL team. He wasn't going to develop any more by participating in this tournament against kids, getting a handful of games in against lesser competition. I'd take away each of those top 3 "positives" as more theoretical and not particularly likely to be real. Two weeks with a coach who isn't the coach trying to get a team to buy into his system could be construed as a negative. I do think those other positives are real though, not the least of which is helping to promote the game/team/player, which is still a thing that matters for this league.