Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Wow, dude, sorry no one liked yours. Cause I know mine was OUTSTANDING. I'll have you know I'm a nine year old girl from Zimbabwe Thank you
  2. gahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Strikeouts are not the issue.
  3. Is there anyone against Cuban at this point? MLB owners? With the market the way it is, do they become more willing to accept him? It's easy to be picky when everybody is throwing money at you.
  4. hyperbole galore here. Where? The word many? The fact is he had some horrible caught stealing numbers and other situations where he took himself off the basepaths, far more than should be acceptable. I think he's implying that Theriot's base running gaffes do not take away enough of his OBP for it to be a relevant point. I don't agree with him, but I think that's his line of thinking. correct. Trying to insinuate that he had so many "baserunning gaffes" that it erased a .390 OBP is hyperbole. Hey, I am all for upgrading ss, Cedeno would be a significant downgrade, not an upgrade. First of all, he didn't insinuate that it erased a .390 OBP. He was saying it was a negative effect, which it did. The word hyperbole has no place in the discussion.
  5. And you never said it "erased" his OBP. It affects it negatively.
  6. Zell on CNBC: I would expect that to be down to 2 people, relatively shortly.
  7. where are these people? Seriously, any sane man knows Dunn is at least two steps ahead of Pujols, owing to his LH stance.
  8. hyperbole galore here. Where? The word many? The fact is he had some horrible caught stealing numbers and other situations where he took himself off the basepaths, far more than should be acceptable.
  9. I don't think the WR talent is weaker. Berrian was nothing special, and Moose dropped far too many balls. Plus you have more receiving options in 2nd year Olson and Forte. I don't think JSC is weaker at LT, certainly not enough to come close to counterbalance the improvement from Miller to Tait. Fred Miller was absolute garbage.
  10. It is forever amusing to me that people post "NTC" as if that is a conclusive end to the argument. Players with no-trade clauses have been traded before and will be traded again. To be sure, the Cubs would need Lee's approval but that's true of every other player who has had a NTC and was nevertheless traded. The fact that he has a no-trade clause is an impediment to trading him, but that doesn't mean it could not possibly happen. I don't think people are saying it means it cannot happen. But some are saying things like, "who cares what Lee thinks, if we can get Tex, byebye."
  11. His solution doesn't make much sense. "I got injured, so now I'll try being a stationary target." That's what bugs me. It's not necessarily a conscious decision to stand still, in fact, it most likely is not. Pocket presence is a tricky thing. You can't look at the lineman and just play keep away, you have to sense how much time before you step up or to the side, it can be subtle. And if you've been spooked by multiple leg injuries, it can affect your timing. Plus, there's the difference between having confidence in Forte and no confidence in Benson, the RB plays a big part in pass protection. Also, Rex had Fred Miller whiffing every play. Tait is a better RT than him, and JSC is probably at least similar to Tait on the left side.
  12. If it was an injury, my guess it was the STL preseason game, when he got hurt in the pocket, rather than MINN, when he got hurt running down field.
  13. I do not like how this goalie situation is working out. It seems to me that Khabi wants out, while Tallon and Savard are playing the part of the PR man acting as though everything is hunky dory. This could get ugly.
  14. If you live in STL, my guess is you'd be able to watch it on CSN accept for games against STL. That's how it works with baseball now, although that is not how it used to work. I had CI once, obviously before they broadcasted many games, so it was pretty worthless.
  15. I bet it'd be close enough to not make it worth them to fight him in arbitration. I bet he'd get the raise and then some (and as you said, the arbitration fight could make later negotiations even more difficult.)
  16. It is not immaterial, because Lee can determine whether he accepts a trade.
  17. Sammy Sosa, Michael Barrett, Jacque Jones all are answers to your 1st question. They were all disgruntled though. I don't think Barrett was disgruntled, he loved being here. It was Lou that wanted him gone. And while the timing was slightly different, he traded Corey right after trading for Pierre, which would be similar to acquiring another 1B and then dealing Lee. Also, Hendry traded away Damian Miller for Barrett, essentially opening a hole and closing it at the same time (same with Choi/Lee for that matter). He also dealt away the starting catcher in 2002 before he had any realistic catching solution ready to replace. And the Nomar trade was a multi-team swap of SS. Anyways, I wouldn't say the "open one hole only to replace it" is hardly the issue here. The question is whether they really feel the need to upgrade 1B in the first place, whether they can get him to accept a deal and get something decent in return, and whether they think they can get Tex.
  18. Way too much of an injury liability. He only played 126 games this year and got 509 PA's and 80% of that came as a DH. He'd be the Rich Harden of the lineup, no reason this team can't afford such a player. Soriano, Bradley, Fukudome, Pie, Johnson and the occasional DeRosa would be a perfectly acceptable OF group.
  19. http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2008-10/42778437.jpg Ultimate sign of failure, or universal sign of person with luggage? How in the hell is that the ultimate sign of failure?
  20. That happens all the time, especially when the "lesser team" won at home.
  21. I'd say the opposite. I think Orton can detect the pressure a lot better than Rex, and sets up the blocking scheme to handle it. That's the key. Grossman was at his best picking apart defenses that sent 4 pass rushers. Once teams saw he could be rattled, they messed with him, and he never adjusted. Orton has been ducking and diving away from pass rushers in every game.
  22. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/baseball/mlb/10/07/marmol.injured.ap/index.html
  23. Monday October 6, 2008 2:36PM Well at least he isn't stubbornly refusing to acknowledge Kyle's been playing better. That's a fairly stark contrast to '06. I can't remember when King finally started to realize we were a good team that year, but I seem to recall it was pretty late -- like not until we won a playoff game late. He was definitely one of the "you can't win a postseason game with Rex" guys. I didn't post that to highlight that he finally came around on Kyle, rather, I was pointing out how absurd it was to write, "back to the drawing board". Really, that's what you got out of the first three weeks of the season? Everybody gave up on Orton based on his rookie year stats, and assumed he would be the same QB he was in 2005. I don't know if he's the longterm answer. I don't know if he's the answer for the rest of 2008. But don't tell me back to the drawing board after a week 3, especially about two paragraphs after admitting it was drops and fumbles by the tight ends that really screwed the Bears, as well as a defensive letdown.
×
×
  • Create New...