Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Actually I think I'd rather watch this on TV than attend. Going to hockey games is better than going to, for instance, football games. But I'm looking forward to waking up late on the 1st, then sitting down on my couch with some friends eating, drinking and watching sports all day. Skiing would be a great option though. Early accuweather forecast calls for wind, cold and snow, high around 20, low of 10
  2. I saw a video yesterday and didn't see how it was evidence of anything.
  3. Familiar with does not equal knowing all the rules. We played a lot of floor hockey, but there was never any icing called. I would imagine most anybody who grew up in an area that regularly fell below freezing during the winter would have a hard time avoiding any exposure to hockey. But then again, I grew up in a mostly white suburb of Chicago during a time when the Blackhawks were very relevant. I'm sure there are plenty of examples of people who never played NHL94, pond hockey, floor hockey or even got on skates. It was very easy to grow up in Chicago and never actually see a hockey game on TV.
  4. Watching the non-HD TSN feed significantly reduced my enjoyment of this game, but it was still pretty sweet.
  5. DVR? Are the tickets paid for and/or can you get your money back? If I had free work tix for the Rangers or Devils, I'd probably go to the game and DVR the Blackhawks game.
  6. Except sandwiches are proven to be good.
  7. Wood, Prior, Zambrano, Marmol and Soto are the Cubs produced guys that have made All Star games this decade. I don't have a problem trading prospects for very good players, but "proven" can mean a lot of things. I would hate to trade prospects, or lose draft picks, for guys like Jason Marquis who might give you proven average major league performance.
  8. There's a finite number of quality options. If a team has the room in the budget I don't see the problem. Boston has consistently gone after top tier talent and made it work within their budget while succeeding at a very high level. Why do people have a problem with that?
  9. 1995 13-year-old KyleJRM listening to the 49ers/Falcons game knowing there is no *way* Steve Young fails to get a measly field goal drive to win it and put the Bears in the playoffs. Oops. I was at the Bears/Eagles game. Christmas Eve. The stadium started to worry when the scoreboard stopped showing the other game's score. i was at that game too. ugh. So was I. It was maybe my 4th or 5th Bears game ever, went with my brother and dad when I was home from college.
  10. Talk about a luxury. The Red Sox don't need Teixeira. Not unless they plan on moving Lowell (or benching him). Youkilis was a Top 3 first baseman last year in the AL. Unless Ortiz is projected to miss significant time on the DL, why would they even need Teixeira? What does need have to do with anything? They want to field the best team they can. Adding a guy like Teixeira would improve their chances. Lowell isn't all that good and he's older. He and Drew are good bets to miss plenty of time. They already lost Manny last year and Ortiz is probably in decline. This is something you do when you try and build a 95-win team every year. I'd like to see if Drew becomes available in trade.
  11. One last prime time matchup against what has been one of the league's most unheralded disappointments this year, the Green Bay Packers. The Bears are 4.5 point favorites against the team that kicked the crap out of them in Green Bay last month. It's quite possible the Bears will have been eliminated from playoff contention before they even step on the field, although other than Minny needing to lose, I'm not sure what other longshot wild card hopes they have. It should be a cold and potentially snowy night. Even if they miss the playoffs I hope they avoid the GB sweep.
  12. what makes that so obvious? oh, and i'd also be remiss if i didn't mention Fuku was roughly 5 runs better than Ibanez on the basepaths last year I'm guessing it's obvious to him because Fukudome didn't just hit some rough patches that held down his numbers, but rather he was a complete piece of crap at the plate for months. I don't get why people are thanking god that Ibanez won't be available. He wasn't ideal, but they are more likely than not getting somebody, and they could do a lot worse. $10m for a 40-year-old Ibanez would have probably been the worst payment per year of any of Hendry's signings, that is until Soriano's 40 (or whatever age he'll be in last year of his contract). When all is said and done, I'm not sure we'll be able to nail down the winner of that award. But for what it's worth, Ibanez turned 36 during this season. A 3 year deal won't pay him a dime when he's 40. Sorry, 39. How dare I round up 1 year. You're so sensitive. I said, for what it's worth. But seriously, who rounds ages? We're talking about a finite number of years these guys play, it's not hard to just use the actual age instead of next highest number that makes my argument look better than it is.
  13. You're calling for running the ball, possession football and lamenting too many passes and at the same time a conservative game plan. No, I'm calling for him to not be simultaneously conservative and stupid. It's fine to play conservative and run the ball when you are leading, have a good running game, and know you can take a large-ish amount of the remaining time off the clock. Throwing short sideline passes which run some risk of a DB jumping the route, have a chance at stopping the clock due to an incompletion, and are easy to stop for little gain in any event are stupid play calls. Running the ball -- which the Bears do well -- combined with a little play action would have been superior. At the five minute mark, passing the ball (as the Bears did twice) for an incompletion and an interception was really dumb. Well I don't think they designed it to be incomplete then intercepted. That would be dumb. But there is nothing wrong with passing in those situations. You can't just run/run/run. They mixed it up, and they won. The only reason it was close was because of Rashied Davis and Olin Kreutz. Everybody can talk about stupid playcalling after the fact. New Orleans running a sweep on 4th down was probably the dumbest play of the month.
  14. I would doubt very much that Derosa would have any sort of positive clubhouse effect on Bradley.
  15. And it's also clear that it's just the opposite with the bat, the far more important part of their games. My point is people are making huge assumptions about the exact nature of the difference with their gloves.
  16. You'd think he'd get more, but this market is not all that cut and dried and you just never know who is going to get what. In terms of talent? Yes. But he won’t get more. His injury history is too vast and his mental baggage history too scary to command more than Ibanez just received. I just can't see it happening. Stranger things have certainly happened though. I should have clarified that what I meant is you'd think Ibanez would get more, because of Bradley's issues, but you never no.
  17. I guess, but I'd cut him the second the team is eliminated from playoff contention then.
  18. and the numbers bear out that Fukudome was a superior player to Ibanez last year and will most likely continue to be for the next three seasons I don't see it. defense I understand the assumption, I just don't see it. People are going a bit overboard around here pretending they can accurately determine the defensive differences.
  19. You'd think he'd get more, but this market is not all that cut and dried and you just never know who is going to get what.
  20. Not if he keeps OPSing in the 600s. you're kidding me you actually think he's had a sufficient MLB sample from which to judge him? he's progressed as a hitter in the minors the last several seasons, fwiw What in his post illicited this response? He said that his defense won't make up for his lack of hitting if he keeps OPSing in the 600s. Not if. That's what he said. He didn't say, Pie has had sufficient MLB sample size to judge that he will always have an OPS of 600. He said if he stays where he's at it's a problem. In other words, he has to get better.
  21. and the numbers bear out that Fukudome was a superior player to Ibanez last year and will most likely continue to be for the next three seasons I don't see it.
  22. You're calling for running the ball, possession football and lamenting too many passes and at the same time a conservative game plan. You are right that the offense is a big reason why the defense wears down. They need to have more sustained drives.
  23. what makes that so obvious? oh, and i'd also be remiss if i didn't mention Fuku was roughly 5 runs better than Ibanez on the basepaths last year I'm guessing it's obvious to him because Fukudome didn't just hit some rough patches that held down his numbers, but rather he was a complete piece of crap at the plate for months. I don't get why people are thanking god that Ibanez won't be available. He wasn't ideal, but they are more likely than not getting somebody, and they could do a lot worse. $10m for a 40-year-old Ibanez would have probably been the worst payment per year of any of Hendry's signings, that is until Soriano's 40 (or whatever age he'll be in last year of his contract). When all is said and done, I'm not sure we'll be able to nail down the winner of that award. But for what it's worth, Ibanez turned 36 during this season. A 3 year deal won't pay him a dime when he's 40.
  24. It doesn't make much sense to compare numbers? I don't care about "seeing flaws", I care about players that can produce.
  25. what makes that so obvious? oh, and i'd also be remiss if i didn't mention Fuku was roughly 5 runs better than Ibanez on the basepaths last year I'm guessing it's obvious to him because Fukudome didn't just hit some rough patches that held down his numbers, but rather he was a complete piece of crap at the plate for months. I don't get why people are thanking god that Ibanez won't be available. He wasn't ideal, but they are more likely than not getting somebody, and they could do a lot worse.
×
×
  • Create New...