what makes that so obvious? oh, and i'd also be remiss if i didn't mention Fuku was roughly 5 runs better than Ibanez on the basepaths last year I'm guessing it's obvious to him because Fukudome didn't just hit some rough patches that held down his numbers, but rather he was a complete piece of crap at the plate for months. I don't get why people are thanking god that Ibanez won't be available. He wasn't ideal, but they are more likely than not getting somebody, and they could do a lot worse. $10m for a 40-year-old Ibanez would have probably been the worst payment per year of any of Hendry's signings, that is until Soriano's 40 (or whatever age he'll be in last year of his contract). When all is said and done, I'm not sure we'll be able to nail down the winner of that award. But for what it's worth, Ibanez turned 36 during this season. A 3 year deal won't pay him a dime when he's 40. Sorry, 39. How dare I round up 1 year. You're so sensitive. I said, for what it's worth. But seriously, who rounds ages? We're talking about a finite number of years these guys play, it's not hard to just use the actual age instead of next highest number that makes my argument look better than it is.