jersey cubs fan
-
Posts
68,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
64
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by jersey cubs fan
-
Bears game 7: Sunday Oct. 24 vs WAS on FOX
jersey cubs fan replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
But that game was close in terms of score almost the entire way. It was a little like it. If they keep playing like this eventually the score will reflect a blowout. Fair enough...I guess it just felt like it because of expectations coming in. Not that we thought, in either case, that we would dominate the other team, but I think we thought going into both of them that we were capable of playing with the other team. Especially this year, after the Dallas and GB wins. Maybe we did stay with NY to some extent, but I guess I just felt deflated in similar fashion after both games. NY didn't blow us out, but with the sacks and the Cutler concussion, I felt a similar level of disappointment. Yeah, it was a similar level of dissapointment, with the same comeback one week later and blowout a bad team (Cleveland last year, Carolina this year). And then the Arizona game last year matches up with Seattle this year. They were 4-4 at that point, but at least now they are still 4-2, so there is room for some optimism. -
Since the incentive to win games isn't nearly as high and you really just want to get guys work in, I don't think abuse of that system matters, even if it does happen.
-
Bears game 7: Sunday Oct. 24 vs WAS on FOX
jersey cubs fan replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
But that game was close in terms of score almost the entire way. It was a little like it. If they keep playing like this eventually the score will reflect a blowout. -
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/joe_sheehan/10/21/alcs.giardi.decisions/index.html?eref=sihp The writer cites Girardi leaning on Phil Hughes success in Arlington over the course of 15 innings, which took place in 2007 and 2009. He also notes that he let Berkman face a lefty (Oliver) because he was 4-6 off of him despite the last hit coming in 2003.
-
Teams like the Yankees able to stash their 6th and 7th starters on the DL in between starts. Wouldn't that apply to everyone? Yes, but a team like the Yankees with excess payroll and a tendancy to hold onto older stars since they can afford it when they decline can pay guys like David Cone to start every 6th or 7th game. It's more of an advantage for rich teams who can afford more players on the payroll than a team like Pittsburgh who probably wouldn't want to pay more people than is necessary.
-
Bears game 7: Sunday Oct. 24 vs WAS on FOX
jersey cubs fan replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
Well its just like last year. Pretty much after the debacle in Cincinnati everyone pretty much knew things were toast. With all the injuries we had on defense and the inconsistent offense, any good team we placed was going to have their way with us. We started 3-1, lost a close game to Atlanta that actually made me feel good about them and then got embarrassed 45-10 by Cincinnati. I think people kind of sensed what was happening. And before we knew it we had lost 8 of 10 games. This year I feel slightly better than we did last year mostly because the defense will keep us in games, whereas last year any good offense we played I expected them to roll over us every single time they had the ball. I think there was still some hope left before Arizona. At least I remember being at the game and sensing that people still held out hope for a playoff run. Everybody gets one crap game to write off and ignore. But the 2nd blowout in 2 weeks ended everything. This years crap games have not been blowouts, so it is different. But one of these times it's going to happen. -
Teams like the Yankees able to stash their 6th and 7th starters on the DL in between starts.
-
Fewer, but the force is more significant, since they usually are the result of a ball to the head. Googling concussions and MLB turns up quite a few examples over the past few years. I think there were a couple relatively high profile ones the past two years. Some guy came back and was really bad. And everybody is up in arms about concussions right now.
-
Teams are hesitant to put a player on the 15-day DL if he only needs to miss 5-6 days. If it's just for concussions though that would be kind of weird.
-
I think people would be a lot more reluctant to lead with their head if their face wasn't protected as much as it is. In fact, pads in general just serve as instruments to inflict pain, not protect from it. I agree it would help, but like you had mentioned in another thread CB's use there helmets like a missle. A helmet to someones unprotected face will do a ton of damage, unless we go to the old school leather helmets, which would be really cool regardless of anything. But they are making contact with both the helmet and facemask area. They are one and the same.
-
I think people would be a lot more reluctant to lead with their head if their face wasn't protected as much as it is. In fact, pads in general just serve as instruments to inflict pain, not protect from it.
-
He's already applying for other gigs some naughty language
-
I think there's going to be a lot of late arrivals and maybe no-shows to today's game. I know a few people who haven't even left yet. And another guy was planning on selling his tickets and the secondary market was dead.
-
im sold!!!!!!!!!!!! I've already informed my wife that our next child (male or female) will be named Quade. I was going with Mike.
-
That's diving while reach out for a guy, very different. What DBs are doing is diving with their arms down and head being used as a missile. It is a very easy to see distinction.
-
They are unnecessary. They are fun and make for good show but completely unnecessary, not counting diving for the ball of course.
-
You shouldn't dive at players to make tackles. It's very risky. If you choose to do so then you are liable for the punishment that can come about as a result of your reckless action. There's no reason to dive, people do it for the theater of the big hit. It's unnecessary, but fun.
-
You shouldn't dive head first at a ball carrier to make a tackle.
-
We let people ruin their later years by letting them smoke too. Maybe education could be better, but shouldn't it be up to the individual if they want to trade a potentially long and healthy life for one with the fame and money that the NFL provides? The problem is that people have their post-football careers ruined by clean and dirty hits alike. That and there is a ton of gray area between what could be a clean/healthy tackle and one that would be ejection worthy. There's also a ton of black and white and people largely ignore them with bogus "slippery slope" and "pussification" defenses.
-
Archer hasn't moved. And if you want help in the bullpen I'm not sure how going for your lesser arms is supposed to help.
-
Because you need help in the bullpen and don't want to trade for other people's junk or spend big money on other people's junk. And you are getting big league value out of him. You can't wait for a spot in the rotation to open for all of these guys, you can't start them all in the rotation, and you have to field a bullpen.
-
He was a relief pitcher for only one year as an amateur, which was his junior year at TCU. Prior to that, he was a starter in junior college and in high school. And he wasn't all that great a pitcher until he became a reliever. And then again when he became a starter again. I don't see the point in putting much weight in Cashner's #s from 4 years ago in college when we have his recent success as a starter to go off of. Success in limited innings.
-
He was a relief pitcher for only one year as an amateur, which was his junior year at TCU. Prior to that, he was a starter in junior college and in high school. And he wasn't all that great a pitcher until he became a reliever.
-
And he had limited experience as a starter because he had limited success as a starter. The assumption people seem to be making is that he was a lock to turn into a 220 inning ace. I just don't see the point in assuming that. Yes, I'd prefer he be a 220 inning ace over a reliever. But odds are that wasn't happening. I'd prefer they have let him stay on as starter, but it's perfectly reasonable to have him be a major league reliever.
-
There's a middle ground to work with here. And the point that was being discussed is they have plenty of good enough arms to fill out the bullpen as well as contend in 2011. There is no reason to assume they cannot win the division next year.
