There’s no way to quantitatively value football players and therefore any BPA discussion begins and ends with some variation of the consensus view of the people in the room doing the evaluation. They group these guys in similar brackets and it makes sense to take a guy who fits best from the group that is available at your pick. You might have 2 guys standing alone, then 3-6 more in the next group. If one of that group is available at 9 he technically fits the BPA distinction. But if the next group is 7-11 and the rest of the groups are empty, any one of those 5 will be the BPA by default and should be taken based on fit. See, that all just sounds like ... drafting. I've always assumed when people were talking about BPA they meant it as some sort of philosophical approach, with drafting for positional need being the opposing philosophy. It actually apparently just means "take a pretty good player who also you kinda want," which seems to me to be vague enough to be useless, but at least now I know it doesn't mean what I thought it meant. You thought this was yahoo draft set to auto pick?