Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,893
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. No offense Brock but I think this is a job for a cubs fan. I nominate @Duke Silver
  2. That was bringing me to the beginning but maybe that was early on in the process
  3. What’s the best way to get to the last unread post in a thread? I’ve been clicking on the “x minutes ago” and it takes me to the last message, but bypasses the last message I would have read.
  4. That cannot be true, at least for final year of arb. Guys get huge bumps in pay at the end. 6 in the final year seems unpossibly low for anybody that is any good at all.
  5. Hoerner guaranteed 3 more years in IL and at least 3 more trips to IL
  6. This organization has done more than any other to maybe actually finally get me to be a fan of one of my local teams I’ve lived near for almost 30 years. It helps that my daughters like them but I’m going to my 6th devils game of the year this week and may look for playoff tickets. blackhawks caving on the pride night jersey was a seriously messed up move after a series of unprecedented screwing up of their fan relations. They’ve traded/given away so many young players in recent years and are so far from ever competing again. They deserve to have the lottery go against them. Maybe be forced to draft the Russian guy and have him never come to the states. Start playing your better prospects next year and finish strong enough to draft 7 or 8 and never get a chance to bring in a stud. Then you’ve got to give away the guys you drafted last year by 2026 so you can hope to reload in time for the 2030 draft.
  7. I’m just dying to make a “tank win” in the Blackhawks thread or at least talk about how cowardly their pride night jersey decision was.
  8. I’m so lost this is weirdly intoxicating. Although that may have been the hangover
  9. I’ll be drunk at a hockey game around that time so I’ll try and get a few last shots off
  10. As if you know what the concept of love is
  11. Sure, just as soon as we stop saying every free agent was actually offered more by another team, or that teams were surprised their guy was available when their turn in the draft came up, or that were ecstatic with our draft class. It’s a harmless catch all phrase that actually does have some meaning because there are definitely teams that will target needs above best player overall. Baseball teams do a version of this all the time, going heavy on pitching or college hitters or whatever else they might be lacking in their system. Not to mention purposely taking a lesser player for signability reasons rather than actually taking BPA. There is no such thing as a universally accepted best player available at any slot, but there are versions of it in every war room and teams either stick with that or let doubt creap into their minds and take the guy that might actually fit their situation instead.
  12. I go to the main forum page to check the status of the donation statistics If we have to click through a website to get here that’s gonna by a bummer
  13. There’s no way to quantitatively value football players and therefore any BPA discussion begins and ends with some variation of the consensus view of the people in the room doing the evaluation. They group these guys in similar brackets and it makes sense to take a guy who fits best from the group that is available at your pick. You might have 2 guys standing alone, then 3-6 more in the next group. If one of that group is available at 9 he technically fits the BPA distinction. But if the next group is 7-11 and the rest of the groups are empty, any one of those 5 will be the BPA by default and should be taken based on fit. See, that all just sounds like ... drafting. I've always assumed when people were talking about BPA they meant it as some sort of philosophical approach, with drafting for positional need being the opposing philosophy. It actually apparently just means "take a pretty good player who also you kinda want," which seems to me to be vague enough to be useless, but at least now I know it doesn't mean what I thought it meant. You thought this was yahoo draft set to auto pick?
  14. Pretty amazing how much money they’ve put into a team that Vegas isn’t sure will win 77 games.
  15. There’s no way to quantitatively value football players and therefore any BPA discussion begins and ends with some variation of the consensus view of the people in the room doing the evaluation. They group these guys in similar brackets and it makes sense to take a guy who fits best from the group that is available at your pick. You might have 2 guys standing alone, then 3-6 more in the next group. If one of that group is available at 9 he technically fits the BPA distinction. But if the next group is 7-11 and the rest of the groups are empty, any one of those 5 will be the BPA by default and should be taken based on fit.
  16. So just a regular Saturday night in nsbb.com
  17. I mean cool, that’s fun, but Myles garret is getting old and spent his entire career on a crappy team. Defensive studs are fun but they don’t win you games.
  18. What in the name of Joey Tribbiani was the reason for putting Pete Alonso's name in quotation marks? Because they were quoting the fans that were “chanting that man’s name”
  19. I may or may not believe all of this, but here's a bullet point list that I would imagine would be used in the pitch: 1. One of probably the 5 most historic franchises in baseball 2. Top 2 baseball market in the US 3. One of the 2 easiest divisions in baseball and an easier road to the postseason 4. Top 5 farm system that will place several prospects in the majors in 2024 and 2025 5. 2023 team just won 82 games and is on the right track 6. We're also going to sign another big free agent to help out (Giolito? Matt Chapman?) 7. Positive reviews of the organization and how they take care of players/families (nutrition, training, helping acclimate to Chicago, etc.) I don’t think anybody outside the Chicagoland area believes 2 to be accurate. And not many agree with 4. Major leaguers also probably don’t care about that. 5 is meaningless and 6 would have to be a prove it scenario. 1 and 7 are really what you have to hang your hat on and that’s touchy-feely stuff that may or may not sway a player.
  20. I reserve the right to make a snarky “all they did was sign linebackers” post in the future but this seems additive.
  21. The obvious shirts guys will make a fun slogan referencing you on a t shirt
  22. You really gonna try and make me open Twitter to read this thread?
  23. I wish the Cubs had a better owner. Turns out $300 million is also what it would take for me to live in Philly. As somebody who has spent a ridiculous amount of time in SE PA for hockey reasons the past two months, I’d settle for $275 million.
×
×
  • Create New...